ANC's Report Clears Executive |
Publication | Business Day |
Date | 2001-05-17 |
Reporter | Linda Ensor |
Web Link | www.bday.co.za |
Soft line taken
on developments around arms probe, says DA
CAPE TOWN African
National Congress (ANC) members of Parliament's public accounts committee have
produced a draft report on developments around the R43bn arms probe, which
opposition parties say completely exonerates the executive of any responsibility
and is silent on its attacks on the committee.
The presentation of
the ANC's report mandated by the party itself follows several months of
unsuccessfully trying to find a multiparty consensus.
ANC spokesman Vincent
Smith said the ANC would "defend the report to the death", and would
not agree to the attachment of minority reports to the main report, which will
be submitted to the national assembly.
The ANC would try to
accommodate the views of the minority parties but would present the amended
report for adoption to a committee meeting scheduled for May 30, he said.
As the minority
parties are opposed to the report, it is considered inevitable that it can only
be adopted by way of a vote, with the ANC using its position as majority party
to push through its version of events.
The ANC report is an
account of the investigating agencies and their tasks. It expresses its
"full confidence in the capacity and integrity of the three agencies"
the public protector, auditor-general and national director of public
prosecutions.
It implicitly
criticises committee chairman Gavin Woods for asking President Thabo Mbeki to
include the Heath special investigating unit in the probe without the
committee's mandate.
The ANC's report
reiterates a committee resolution, passed with its majority vote, that the
committee did not intend for the Heath unit to be involved.
The executive's
position on the contract price is accepted, with the report saying "that
any attempt to affix any possible future costs would be merely one of a number
of projections".
Woods said he could
not agree to the ANC report which was a capitulation to the executive. He
rejected its interpretation of the original resolution regarding the inclusion
of the Heath unit and its inappropriate response to the criticisms by cabinet
ministers and Deputy President Jacob Zuma of the committee's work. Woods felt it
imperative that the committee defend its work and integrity and said its
accountability role would be undermined if this was not done.
Democratic Alliance
(DA) spokeswoman Raenette Taljaard also said the report treated the executive
far too favourably.
It adopted too soft a
line on the costs of the deal and the cabinet's responsibility for
subcontracting, despite the evidence to the contrary emerging from the
investigation. It was also "completely silent" on the constitutional
issues raised in the interaction between the executive and the legislature.
The DA believed it was
"problematic" for cabinet ministers to try to delimit their
accountability to the primary contracts when it appeared that they were involved
in subcontracting as well, and that there were possible quid pro quo links
between prime contracts and subcontractors.
Woods and Taljaard
objected to the ANC apologising to the executive for the committee's supposed
accusations of corruption and dishonesty, which they said were never made.
United Democratic
Movement leader Bantu Holomisa also rejected the report but said the UDM would
engage with the ANC to try to improve it.
The
DA believed the ANC's report "would tilt the executive-legislature
relationship in favour of the executive and distort the balance the constitution
envisages".
With
acknowledgment to Linda Ensor and Business Day.