ANC Resists Woods on Arms Documents |
Publication | Business Day |
Date | 2001-05-31 |
Reporter | Linda Ensor |
Web Link | www.bday.co.za |
Ruling
party members want a week to consider his request
CAPE TOWN Attempts by
the chairman of the parliamentary committee on public accounts, Gavin Woods, to
gain access to confidential documents on the arms deal from the defence
department came up against African National Congress (ANC) reluctance yesterday.
At issue is the future
role of the committee in the arms probe and whether it will conduct an
investigation independently of that of the auditor-general, national directorate
of public prosecutions and the public protector.
The role of the
committee in the arms probe will be highlighted now that it has adopted the
ANC's version of a report on developments since September, when the committee
passed a resolution calling for an investigation into the R43bn arms deal. All
minority parties opposed the report, which failed to address executive attacks
on the committee's work.
The ANC caucus decided
last week that it would not accept minority reports attached to committee
reports, but the report adopted yesterday noted that this was done without
consensus. The ANC rejected all amendments suggested by the Democratic Alliance
(DA).
Woods sought a
committee mandate to request the documents relating to the evaluation of the
preferred bidders for the five prime contracts by the defence evaluation
committee.
He said it was
important for the committee to understand the mechanics of the selection
process, not least so it could prepare itself to inspect the findings of the
investigative team.
The auditor-general's
report on the R43bn arms package pinpointed concern about the process of
approving some of the prime projects.
Woods, backed by the
DA, said the committee had a constitutional obligation to conduct its own
investigation. He noted that National Assembly speaker Frene Ginwala had
enjoined it to do so, and hoped that directions for this investigation would
emerge from perusal of evaluation documents.
But ANC committee
members asked for a week to consider the matter and wanted to know why these
documents were being called for. They said the request should have been tabled
in a proper manner. Bruce Kannemeyer asked whether this meant the committee was
to conduct its own independent and parallel investigation.
ANC member Neo
Masithela insisted that the ANC was not contesting the right of committee
members to gain access to documents, but first it had to identify what issues
required follow-up.
Woods said he wanted
the documents for exploratory purposes, and described the ANC's hesitance as
illogical.
"Certain avenues
for investigation could arise from an exploration of the documents," Woods
said. "In contemplating the bigger picture of the arms deal, I will be
requesting a mandate for other information in future."
DA spokesman on public
accounts Raenette Taljaard said he was "deeply disappointed the ANC used
its parliamentary majority to crush minority opinions. By adopting a meek and
apologetic report on the actions of the executive, ANC members on the committee
have cow-towed to the interests of their party bosses and failed to put the
interests of Parliament and the people first."
With acknowledgment
to Linda Ensor and Business Day.