"Auditor-General's Integrity is Intact" |
Publication | Quickwire |
Date | 2001-01-30 |
Reporter | Sapa |
Web Link |
The Audit Commission on Tuesday said it was
satisfied that the integrity of the auditor-general's office had not been
compromised or impaired during the furore about the probe into R43-billion arms
deal.
The auditor-general's special review of the arms
procurement package has recently been criticised by members of the executive,
including Deputy President Jacob Zuma.
The statutory body - the de facto board of
directors of the auditor-general's office - met in Cape Town for four hours as a
result of the controversy surrounding the multi-agency investigation.
It consists of eight MPs and three outside
experts, chaired by ANC MP Pallo Jordan.
Fakie's report found deviations from accepted practice
The commission was fully briefed by
Auditor-General Shauket Fakie about his role in the investigation and on his
office's interaction with members of the executive, Jordan said in a
statement.
"The Audit Commission wished publicly to
re-affirm its full confidence in the Auditor-General Shauket Fakie and in the
Auditor-General's office as led by him.
"The Audit Commission affirms its commitment
to the independence of the Auditor-General's Office, as prescribed by the
Constitution, and is satisfied that at no time has the integrity of the
Auditor-General's Office been impaired or compromised," Jordan said.
The commission was also confident that the
auditor-general's office would conduct a comprehensive and thorough
investigation of the arms deal "consistent with the high performance
standards that office has displayed".
Earlier this month, in a hard-hitting letter to
the chair of parliament's public accounts committee (Scopa), Gavin Woods (of the
IFP), Zuma accused the committee of misdirecting itself and was also critical of
the auditor-general's office.
Feinstein would not comment about his talk with
Doidge
This followed statements by four senior cabinet
ministers that Fakie's special review of the arms deal tabled in parliament was
based on misunderstanding and ill-informed and wrong conclusions.
Defence Minister Mosiuoa Lekota, Finance Minister
Trevor Manuel, Trade and Industry Minister Alec Erwin and Public Enterprises
Minister Jeff Radebe said the review was not based on all the facts and was
"too cursory to do justice" to the issues.
They claimed the review unjustifiably queried
government's integrity, giving no concrete facts suggesting corruption. It also
reflected a lack of understanding of the acquisition process.
Fakie's report found there had been material
deviations from generally accepted procurement practices and recommended, in the
light of the many allegations of possible irregularities in contracts awarded to
subcontractors, that a forensic audit be conducted.
This was denied by the auditor-general's
office.
Some MPs, including the Pan Africanist Congress'
Patricia de Lille, said they believed the ministerial attack was
unconstitutional. However, this view was not shared by Fakie.
In terms of the Constitution, all organs of state
should protect the independence, impartiality, dignity and effectiveness of
Chapter 9 institutions like the A-G, which are state institutions supporting
democracy.
In a statement last week, Fakie stood by his
special review.
He also rejected media reports that he had
changed his stance on the involvement of the Heath Special Investigating Unit in
the probe.
Fakie said he had backed Heath's inclusion on the
grounds that its skills and experience could add value to the
investigation.
However, the decision to include or exclude Heath
was a presidential one and if President Thabo Mbeki rejected the unit, the other
agencies would continue.
Also on Tuesday, a sub-committee of Scopa -
tasked with ironing out differences of interpretation within the committee about
whether Heath should be included in the probe or not - met briefly in
parliament.
According to Woods, the group met to discuss the
agenda for their meeting scheduled for next Wednesday.
Meanwhile, Andrew Feinstein, an ANC member of
parliament, was still considering his future after being sidelined by his party
on Monday.
Speaking after an hour-long meeting with ANC
deputy chief whip Geoff Doidge in Parliament, he said: "I am no nearer to a
decision".
On Monday he said he would have to reconsider his
position on the committee and parliament.
This followed the decision by party bosses to
replace him with Doidge as chair of the ANC's key study group on public
accounts.
The move has been viewed as another attempt by
the executive to take control of the probe Feinstein, along with Woods, drove
the committee process.
Feinstein would not comment about his talk with
Doidge, saying only that the deputy chief whip had asked for the meeting.
With acknowledgement to Sapa and Independent Online.