Registrar Urges Yengeni Probe |
Publication | News24 |
Date | 2001-05-08 |
Reporter | Sapa |
Web Link | www.news24.co.za |
Cape
Town - Parliament's Registrar of Members' Interests believes there is some
substance to claims of alleged impropriety surrounding ANC Chief Whip Tony
Yengeni's acquisition of a luxury vehicle from a company linked to the arms
deal.
The Registrar, Fazela Mohamed, has recommended
that Parliament's ethics committee authorise an investigation into whether
Yengeni failed to disclose the vehicle as a gift or a benefit, as obliged by
Parliament's code of ethics.
The allegations are also the subject of a wider
probe into the arms deal by the Public Protector's office, the Auditor-General
and the National Directorate of Public Prosecutions.
Meanwhile, the official opposition has accused
Yengeni of defiance, evasiveness and holding Parliament in contempt.
Yengeni is accused of failing to declare in the
register of members' interests a Mercedes-Benz 4x4 vehicle.
He is also alleged not to have disclosed his
residential property in Tijgerhof, Cape Town.
Mohamed tabled Yengeni's reply at a closed
session of the committee on Tuesday.
It only opened its proceedings to the public
after satisfying itself that Mohamed's report did not include confidential
aspects of the register.
Yengeni, who was given three chances to reply to
Mohamed's request for information, again alleged that Parliament's rules and
procedures were not followed.
He also complained that his correspondence had
been leaked to the press and MPs.
Yengeni repeats 'legitimate purchasing of car
Yengeni repeated what he had said in his special
statement to Parliament on March 28 - that he had legitimately purchased the
vehicle.
"Its acquisition does not in any way amount
to a gift or a donation and therefore there was no interest to be
declared."
He had disclosed the Tijgerhof property in 1996,
and understood Parliament's rules "that if one discloses a particular
interest, there is no reason to do so again".
In her report, Mohamed said: "It may be
assumed that the non-disclosure was not meant to mislead the committee, but
could instead by construed as an omission."
However, on his reply to the vehicle allegations,
she said: "Mr Yengeni's response cannot be construed as sufficient to
determine the facts."
"Mr Yengeni's response does not refute the
detail contained in the (Sunday Times) article, nor does he explain the
circumstances related to the acquisition or funding of the motor vehicle."
Consideration had to be given to the information
contained in the Sunday Times report, she said.
"The allegations cannot be dismissed as
unfounded, as on the face of it, it appears that there may be some substance to
the report," Mohamed said.
"I recommend that the committee authorise an
investigation to determine the facts."
Gibson disappointed with Yengeni's reply
Democratic Alliance Chief Whip, Douglas Gibson,
who lodged the original complaint based on the Sunday Times article in March,
said he was disappointed with Yengeni's reply.
All Yengeni had to do was give a simple statement
"on how he acquired the vehicle, how he paid for it, and produce proof that
he is paying for it".
"Instead of that he's chosen not to
co-operate with this committee... I think he's been defiant, evasive and he's
being disingenuous," he said.
Yengeni was also perpetuating his misleading
statement to the National Assembly that he disclosed the property in 1996, when
he was well aware disclosure had to be made annually.
Gibson questioned why, if Yengeni did not believe
disclosure had to be made annually, he chose to declare his Guguletu property
every year.
Gibson rejected Mohamed's recommendation that the
Sunday Times and the company DaimlerChrysler Financial Services should be asked
to hand over its documentation to the committee.
"Tell Mr Yengeni to produce the documents.
What is this nonsense. He's been allowed to get away with it because of who he
is," he said.
Mohamed, and several opposition MPs, including
the PAC's Patricia de Lille and the ACDP's Louis Green, has called for Yengeni
to appear before the committee.
The
committee adjourned proceedings until Wednesday afternoon, when it will discuss
how to move forward.
With
acknowledgment to Sapa and News24.