Scopa Chair Rebuffs ANC |
Publication | News24 |
Date | 2001-05-09 |
Reporter | Sapa |
Web Link | www.news24.co.za |
Parliament - Parliament's watchdog public
accounts committee chairman Gavin Woods on Wednesday challenged the ANC to act
against him if the party was unhappy with his actions as head of Scopa.
At a special meeting of Scopa, requested by the
African National Congress, the party accused Woods (IFP) of speaking about the
multi-billion rand arms deal on behalf of the committee without consulting its
members.
The ANC's Vincent Smith said the party wanted to
disassociate itself from the chairman's recent comments that Scopa appeared to
be kept in the dark about the probe into the deal.
He warned Woods not to speak on behalf of the
committee without consulting its members in future.
'Comments were my personal view'
Woods rejected the argument, saying the comments
were his personal view.
"I think if you look at the English of it
(the article), you will see that I expressed a personal view about the
committee, which I think I am quite entitled to do."
He would defend his principles and would continue
to express his personal views on the deal.
If the ANC did not agree with his actions, it
should make a decision about his position as chairman of Scopa, Woods said.
Woods told Sapa on Sunday that Scopa - which
originally called for a multi-agency probe into the deal - had been sidelined.
"The committee is still pretty much in the
dark regarding the investigators' plans."
On whether the committee had been sidelined, he
said: "We have been sidelined. We had interventions by the (National
Assembly) Speaker, which by design created uncertainty about accountability
arrangements".
He also said the Auditor-General, who is leading
the probe, had requested Scopa members not to contact his staff about the arms
deal.
These views were later repeated during an
interview on Cape Talk.
'Clear that comments made on behalf of
committee'
While Smith seemed to accept the explanation,
some of the party's other members rejected Woods's answer, saying it was quite
clear that the comments were made on behalf of the committee.
"I don't know by what stretch of the
imagination you could say that it was your personal view," ANC MP Billy
Nair said.
Woods and ANC members have been at odds before,
particularly regarding the issue of whether the committee had wanted the Heath
special investigating unit to be involved in the probe.
Democratic Alliance public accounts spokesperson
Raenette Taljaard said the ANC should be careful about trying to restrict the
freedom of speech of fellow members.
It was also her view that Scopa was, indeed,
being kept in the dark about the probe.
Nair angrily reacted that the ANC was the last
party to threaten freedom of speech, as it had fought for that right for
decades.
"No-one should come and lecture us about
freedom of speech, least of all Raenette."
It was clear to him that, despite the denials,
Woods had spoken on behalf of the committee.
"If you are saying you are the committee,
then I am afraid you are mistaken Dr Woods... we can go around in circles and
talk about freedom of speech... it's all bullshit."
'Irrational comments'
Woods said he would not respond to Nair's
"latest irrational comments".
In a meeting earlier this year, the two MPs were
engaged in a heated exchange about Woods releasing his views on the arms deal to
the media.
Nair had accused him of attempting to "bring
down the government".
One or two of the ANC members seemed embarrassed
by Wednesday's proceedings, and Andrew Feinstein, the party's former public
accounts study group chair, stormed out of the meeting.
Feinstein
was also replaced as one of the three ANC members compiling an interim report on
the arms deal.
With
acknowledgment to Sapa and News24.