Not All Arms Deal Claims to See Light |
Publication | Business Day |
Date | 2001-06-15 |
Reporter | Alan Fine |
Web Link | www.bday.co.za |
CAPE
TOWN Startling allegations of corruption in the controversial R43bn arms deal
are being probed by investigators, but only a fraction of them will see the
light of day at the public hearings being held in Pretoria.
An undated document
prepared by investigators shows that the intention is for the hearings to cover
mainly matters related to the cost of the package, its fiscal implications and
the path the procurement package followed, including scrutiny of its
presentation to cabinet.
A source said a key
intention of the hearing was that its public impact should be
"constructive" and "healing".
The document lists 43
specific allegations received by investigators, of which only three are intended
to be raised at the hearing. Two of the three are already in the public arena.
Most of the other
allegations are identified as in need of a "thorough criminal
investigation" and not for airing at the hearings, which are being chaired
by Public Protector Selby Baqwa.
Seven of the 43 are
identified as having Pan Africanist Congress MP Patricia de Lille as their
original source.
One of the allegations
to be heard involves "a possible conflict of interest in respect of various
persons involved in the overall acquisition process due to directorships,
shareholding, relatives, etc". This involves defence procurement chief
Chippy Shaik and his brother Shabir, a matter already raised at the hearings
this week by Jayendra Naidoo. The document says "specific allegations"
in this regard will not be heard.
Another, which may be
raised "at a later date" relates to an individual involved in the
process who is "a director of a company (which) has a major shareholding in
a subcontractor".
The third is the case
involving Richard Young's company C²I², an unsuccessful bidder for the
corvette combat suite. Young publicly raised allegations of irregularities some
months ago.
The document lists the
remaining allegations, in many cases naming individuals and/or companies linked
to them. In no cases have allegations been proven.
These include
"persons involved in the overall acquisition process amongst which (sic)
high-ranking officials received gifts including motor vehicles, jewellery, cash
and shares in companies, from prime contractors/bidders".
ANC MP Tony Yengeni
alleged to have received a Mercedes 4x4 is listed here, along with eight others.
Although there are few cases where the "gift" values are specified,
where they are the amounts total about R350m.
The document also
lists among the allegations:
A high-ranking
official is a shareholder of a local subcontractor that is a beneficiary of a
prime contractor's offset offer;
A major role-player in
the acquisition process subsequently became a director of one of the prime
contractors;
Various role-players
hold shares through nominees in entities which benefited from the acquisition;
A prime contractor
offered a 3% commission on the total package to an unnamed recipient;
A prime contractor
imported expensive vehicles and sold them at bargain prices to people involved
in the acquisition;
A prime contractor
paid bribes amounting to £10m;
Certain individuals
acquired properties by means of bribe money;
A director of a local
defence parastatal is head of a subcontractor that stands to make billions of
rands from the arms deal;
Minutes of certain
meetings pertaining to selection criteria were subsequently altered;
An individual involved
in the acquisition process told bidders that success depended on coming to a
specific arrangement with two SA subcontractors;
A bidder for two
aspects of the package was told to withdraw its bid for one (and was successful
in its bid for the other); and
Four people involved
in the acquisition are named as allegedly having links to Cell C's local
empowerment partner, Cellsaf, and two with the Mpumalanga Parks Board scandal.
With acknowledgement to Alan Fine and Business Day.