TV and Radio Lose Bid to Broadcast Arms Probe |
Publication | Independent Online |
Date | 2001-06-11 |
Reporter | Sapa |
Web Link | www.iol.co.za |
The panel leading public
hearings in the probe into South Africa's multi-billion rand arms deal on Monday
turned down an application for television and radio broadcasts of the
proceedings.
Explaining this ruling, panel chairperson Selby Baqwa said: "The principle
of transparency cannot be applied in a carte blanche matter."
One
consideration was the fact that the presence of television cameras would amount
to an invasion of the privacy of witnesses. Another issue was the seriousness of
the matter at hand, he said.
Many witnesses due to testify would do so with the permission of the minister of
defence. "This indicates the seriousness of the issues we are dealing
with," Baqwa said.
'Seriousness
of the issues we are dealing with'
Baqwa said none of the
three agencies probing the arms deal commonly performed their work in public.
The decision to conduct to conduct a portion of the
investigation in public was therefore unprecedented.
"It is necessary to encourage and preserve the
confidence and trust which the ordinary citizen - who is also a future potential
witness or whistle-blower - has in these agencies."
The legal
representatives of the South African Broadcasting Corporation and e.tv asked for
a 20 minute adjournment to discuss the ruling with their clients.
The public hearing
resumed in the Pretoria High Court on Monday after it was postponed two weeks
ago without any evidence being led.
40
and 50 allegations of wrongdoing
The
decision to postpone was taken by Baqwa after the senior counsel for the defence
department, Michael Kuper, contended the subject matter in the hearing was
complicated and required more study and preparation from his team.
Meanwhile,
e.tv news reported on Sunday that two forensic auditors, Wally van Heerden and
Etienne Smit, had been dropped from the investigation.
Baqwa's
spokesperson, Nicolette Teichmann, said one of the men was taken off the probe
because he was an auditor for the defence department and faced a conflict of
interest.
Three government agencies - the Public Protector, the
National Directorate of Public Prosecutions and the Auditor-General's office -
are probing between 40 and 50 allegations of wrongdoing in the arms deal at the
request of parliament's watchdog public accounts committee, Scopa.
Each is represented on the three-man panel presiding
over the hearing.
Baqwa
represents his office, that of the Public Protector, while Herman van Zyl
represents Auditor-General Shauket Fakie and Silas Ramaite the National
Directorate of Public Prosecutions.
In another development, Scopa chairperson Gavin Woods
has indicated that his committee was obliged to continue with its own
investigation into the arms deal.
With
acknowledgement to Sapa and Independent Online.