Zuma Wants Proof from Scopa |
Publication | News24 |
Date | 2001-02-05 |
Editor | Sapa |
Web Link |
Cape Town - Deputy
President Jacob Zuma has urged Parliament's standing committee on public
accounts (Scopa) to produce evidence of alleged malpractice in the R43 billion
arms deal.
He also wants Scopa,
in its next report to Parliament, to substantiate its conclusion that defence
acquisitions were "usually attended by malpractice, with the purchasing
countries being victims of such malpractice".
Zuma made the comments
in a letter to National Assembly Speaker Dr Frene Ginwala, dated January 31, in
reply to one she sent to him two days earlier.
This is the second
letter that Zuma has written to Parliament about the matter.
In a previous
hard-hitting letter to Scopa chairman Dr Gavin Woods, Zuma criticised the
committee for "seriously misdirecting itself" and "arriving at
decisions that are not substantiated by any facts".
Replying to Zuma then,
Ginwala said it was evident that there were differences among Scopa members on
what its report of November 3 last year had intended to convey.
Opposition parties
insist the committee was unanimous in the view that Judge Willem Heath's
anti-corruption unit should be involved in a multi-agency probe into the deal,
although the ANC claims no agency was singled out.
Zuma said in his reply
to Ginwala, released to Sapa on Monday, that he was pleased to learn that the
Assembly was due to receive a further report from Scopa.
He hoped it would be
able to address more clearly the matters raised in its preliminary report, which
had also alleged flawed selection procedures in the arms deals regarding the
appointment of contractors.
Zuma said it would be
helpful if Scopa in its next report answered the following questions: On what
information did Scopa base its conclusion that improper influence might have
been exerted in "certain of these selections"?; Which selections were
being referred to and who were the influential parties?; What evidence caused
Scopa to reach the conclusion that influential parties might have influenced the
choice of sub-contractors?; and Why did Scopa omit to invite the Ministers
involved in the process to clarify and answer questions, prior to the
finalisation of the National Assembly's preliminary report?
Zuma was referring to
Finance Minister Trevor Manuel, Trade and Industry Minister Alec Erwin, Defence
Minister Mosiuoa Lekota and Public Enterprises Minister Jeff Radebe.
They slammed Scopa at
a media conference last month for not understanding how arms deals worked, and
are scheduled to address the committee soon.
Scopa is to meet in full plenary again on
Wednesday to discuss its sub-committee's report on the different interpretations
of the November 3 report.
With acknowledgement to Sapa and News24.