For a court case of a relatively technical nature, the trial of Schabir Shaik on charges of corruption and fraud has developed into a captivating judicial tussle.

Although it lacks the sensationalism of, say, a high-profile murder or pornography case, the stature of the personalities involved has assured this trial of its place in South African legal history.

Although it is Shaik alone who faces charges of criminal intent, the alleged involvement of Vice President Jacob Zuma in his business activities has elevated proceedings to a matter of national interest.

With the distinct possibility that the ANC stalwart could be the next president of the country, it is a matter of public concern that his role, or lack of it, in this lengthy judicial saga be fully examined.

The simple truth of the matter is that Zuma is not on trial. Yet it is equally true that severe suspicions exist in the minds of most members of the public over his role in the affair.

For this reason, if not purely in the interests of justice, it is advisable that Zuma take the opportunity in open court to state his case. If he fails to do so, the suspicions and innuendo will be compounded and that will not auger well for his political future.

As in all litigious matters, there are always two sides to a story, and Shaik will have the opportunity this week to give his version of the events leading up to his prosecution.

It is likely to be an interesting legal battle and one that all South Africans will follow closely.

At the end of the day justice will only be served if there is full disclosure and Shaik's guilt or innocence is proven one way or the other.

It is certain to be an interesting week in court.

With acknowledgement to the Daily News.