Business As Usual with French Arms Company Thales |
Publication | Cape Times |
Date |
2005-06-16 |
Reporter |
Alameen Templeton |
Web Link |
Government credibility 'falls apart'
The government has no intention of blacklisting the French arms company that
allegedly bribed ex-Deputy President Jacob Zuma.
The National Treasury said yesterday that there had been no
evidence *1 in the recent Schabir Shaik trial linking Zuma to a bribe
from Thomson-CSF or its subsidiaries in South Africa, Thint and Thales.
Since details of the arms deal scandal first emerged, Thales has been appointed
one of the sub-contractors to provide a R16 billion ground-based air defence
system (GBADS) for South Africa.
Thales's portion of the contract is believed to be worth about R2bn, arms
industry sources said.
Treasury spokesman Logan Wort was adamant yesterday that no
grounds existed for even considering blacklisting the company *1.
"Regarding the link between Thales and the deputy president, we will only
look at that if a court makes a link *2 between the
deputy president and Thomson, so there's no link for us to look at," Wort
said.
When asked if this meant Thomson-CSF or its subsidiaries would face the
possibility of blacklisting only if Zuma was successfully prosecuted, he said:
"My comment is that there's no case against the deputy president, the
former deputy president, that has been made, so there's no case for us to
explain regarding a link between Thomson and the deputy president," he
said.
This was despite Justice Hilary Squires finding last week that Zuma had attended
a meeting with Shaik and Thint representative Alain Thetard. They agreed at that
meeting, Judge Squires found, to pay Zuma R500 000 a year in exchange for Zuma's
promise to protect their interests in the arms deal.
Terry Crawford-Browne, the head of Economists Allied for Arms Reduction, was
dismayed at the response: "It's appalling that the government keeps
blocking this. Here they have been caught with their fingers in the cookie jar
and it shouldn't be for civil society to keep fighting them.
"This is where their credibility falls apart. Are
they serious about fighting corruption? Why is it that they fight every
step of the way instead of being proactive in ensuring clean government?"
he asked.
Although a clause in the arms deal allows the government to cancel the deal if
corruption is uncovered, arms deal analysts are of the broad opinion that the
corvette deal - which incorporated African Defence Systems, a Thint subsidiary,
is too far advanced for it to be reversed.
However, Crawford-Browne, believes the entire deal should be cancelled because
"like in Watergate, the cover up is becoming worse
than the scandal".
Thint's South African representative, Pierre Moynot, was unavailable for comment
yesterday.
Neither of the local arms parastatals that deal with Thomson - Armscor and Denel
- were willing to discuss the issue of its continued presence in South Africa.
India, on the other hand, has adopted a far more confrontational approach to
arms dealers who try to bribe their officials.
Denel, which is the prime GBADS contractor, had a contract to supply 160 G6
self-propelled field guns cancelled by the Indian government, which is
investigating accusations that Denel paid bribes to win the deal.
Denel spokesman Eddie Mkuchane denied Denel ever bribed officials. "We
always act within the law," he said.
Ironically, Denel faces being pushed off the field gun deal by Swedish firm
Bofors, which became embroiled in a major scandal of its own in the mid-1980s,
resulting in India blacklisting it until very
recently.
With acknowledgements to Alameen Templeton and the Cape Times.
*1
*2