Arms Offsets Net SA $3,5bn, New Jobs - and Headaches |
Publication | Business Report |
Date |
2005-10-17 |
Reporter |
Lynda Loxton |
Web Link |
The
offset programmes linked to the controversial multibillion-rand arms deal had so
far resulted in a net gain of $3,5 billion (R22,9 billion)
*1 and 8 000 new jobs, but there had been huge risks involved, with some
projects folding, parliament heard on Friday.
Lionel October, the deputy
director-general overseeing the programmes in the department of trade and
industry, told the portfolio committee on trade and industry that after a slow
start in 2001, most of the 130 projects had picked up momentum over the past
year.
The overall failure rate had been about 1 percent, either because
of changed market conditions or fraud, which was now being
investigated.
The so-called strategic defence procurement programme
linked to the arms deal or aircraft purchases by SAA is made up of two sections.
The national industrial participation programme (NIP) requires suppliers
to invest about 30 percent of the value of the contracts won in local, civilian
companies. In the defence industrial participation (DIP) programme, arms
suppliers have to source components for the arms bought by South Africa from the
local defence industry.
NIP programmes have generated investment credits
worth more than $1 billion and exports and local sales credits worth $2.5
billion.
NIP partnership projects have ranged from the local manufacture
of galleys for the Airbus A319 and A320 to the production of cockpit modules for
the BMW 3 Series for export.
October said BAE/Saab was the best
performer, meeting 100 percent of investment targets by 2004/05. Thales had also
done well, although there were concerns about some of its DIP projects meeting
their targets.
Ferrostaal, which was the laggard when the department
reported to parliament last year, had dramatically improved its performance,
while Agusta and Thyssen had met no more than just over half of their
targets.
In Agusta's case, as a company owned by the Italian government,
it could not invest abroad and therefore had to try to convince other Italian
companies to invest in South Africa.
BAE/Saab's NIP projects had included
a fund for small start-up companies, a gold loan scheme for jewellers, carbon
manufacturing, high-pressure die casting and a new ferrochrome smelter.
It had invested $6 million in a gold benefication project in Virginia
that had folded, with two employees now being investigated by the
Scorpions.
Thyssen projects included a ferrochrome smelter, the
manufacture of aluminium radiators and a packaging company.
Ferrostaal
had funded a new turbine blade project, the resuscitation of the Magwa Tea
Estate, a plastic bottles recycling plant, a training centre in the depressed
area of Atlantis and an engineering services firm.
The Magwa project had
been difficult because experts had to be brought in from India to help revive
the project. October said this highlighted the risks involved in offset
programmes, especially as the arms manufacturers had no experience or skills in
the projects chosen.
Thales had invested in a carbon fibre plant, the
production of silicon metals and fume dioxides, solar panel production and a
medical waste company. There were concerns *3 that it
might not be able to meet its DIP obligations *2, but
negotiations were continuing and penalty clauses would hopefully not have to be
invoked
With acknowledgements to Lynda Loxton and Business Report.