Publication: The Natal Witness Issued: Date: 2006-08-02 Reporter: Reporter:

A Brief Sitting

 

Publication 

The Natal Witness

Date 2006-08-02

Reporter

Editorial

Web Link

www.witness.co.za

 

Judge Herbert Msimang engaged fully in Monday’s proceedings and lost no time in asserting himself . . .

It's good to know at last the identity of the judge who will conduct the Zuma trial. Judge Herbert Msimang engaged fully in Monday’s proceedings and lost no time in asserting himself. He is certainly aware that public scrutiny of his conduct of the trial will be intense, and that he will be expected to chart a carefully central course through the proceedings, acting and speaking with complete fairness to both sides. He’ll know, too, that he’ll be expected to put the primacy of the case first, striving not to be distracted by extraneous matters and the red herrings political lobby groups may well have in store for him.

Monday’s events provided insights and clarification of a number of issues. First, the expected huge turn-out in support for Jacob Zuma didn’t materialise, although several thousand ardent enthusiasts were present and demonstrated vociferously. Also, a number of senior KZN political figures made a point of publicly aligning themselves with him. Clearly, he’s a popular figure and highly respected in some quarters, and, whether or not it’s postponed beyond the month stipulated by the judge, the outcome of his trial will have considerable political ramifications and repercussions.

An important feature of the brief sitting was Zuma’s affidavit, in which he denied any corrupt connection with the arms deal, and claimed that his court appearance was the culmination of a plot against him by President Thabo Mbeki and others bent on sidelining him and preventing him from becoming the next South African president. This is not the first time he’s made the conspiracy accusation, and it’s time it was subjected to full public examination, and properly disproved or validated. If it is disproved, then it may be seen as the last-ditch lashing out of a cornered politician who, by his own actions having destroyed the bright and powerful future he’d planned for himself, is trying to salvage it by blaming others. If this serious accusation is validated, however, the scope of and reasons for such a conspiracy must be made known if our democracy is to be kept on track.

With ackowledgement to The Natal Witness.