Publication: Sapa
Issued: Johannesburg
Date: 2006-02-13
Reporter: Sapa
Reporter:
Reporter:
What Does Rape and Corruption Have In Common, Ngoepe
Asks |
Publication |
Sapa BC-COURT-2ND-LD-RECUSE
|
Issued
|
Johannesburg
|
Date |
2006-02-13 |
Reporter
|
Sapa |
Transvaal
Judge President Bernard Ngoepe demanded to know what
corruption and rape had in common *1 as he heard an application for his
own recusal from the rape trial of former deputy president Jacob Zuma on
Monday.
"What is there in common between allegations of corruption and
rape?" Ngoepe asked Zuma's counsel, Kemp Kemp (correct), in the Johannesburg
High Court.
Kemp made the recusal application at the start of the trial,
saying that the layman believed that Ngoepe had been
swayed by statements presented to him in an application for Zuma's homes and his
lawyer's offices to be searched last year.
The National Prosecuting
Authority made the search applications ahead of Zuma's corruption trial in June
this year. Ngoepe issued the warrants.
Kemp was concerned about the
consequences for the duration of the trial and afterwards if Ngoepe remained the
presiding officer.
Zuma sat quietly throughout the
exchange, at times heated, at times light, with a notepad in front of
him. He was no longer sitting in the dock, but at a
table behind his legal team.
Herman Broodryk, a member of the prosecution
team, said Ngoepe had not made a credibility finding about Zuma when he granted
the search warrants.
"The accused's fears are not
reasonably founded, therefore we do not support the application," he
said.
Zuma's legal team has indicated that a second
application for an adjournment would also be brought.
Ngoepe said
he would only hear the second application once he had decided on the
recusal.
Before the State replied to Kemp's application, Ngoepe leaned
forward and said: "Judges should not recuse themselves easily because an impression should not be given to the public that litigants can
pick and chose judges."
The woman who accused Zuma of rape arrived
at 7am, but, although she was said to be in the court building, was not in the
court room when the proceedings started.
With ackowledgements to Sapa.
*1 Both are wrongdoings of both a
criminal and civil nature.
Mr J.G. Zuma has been accused by The State of
both on the criminal aspect.
Other than that - nothing, I would
respectfully submit.
*2 A most unfortunate choice
of words, seeing that Adv Kemp J. Kemp SC had just submitted that it was his
client that was concerned.