Publication: Cape Times
Issued:
Date: 2006-07-05
Reporter: Linda Daniels
Reporter:
Reporter:
Arms Deal Contracts a Success, Assures Erwin |
The
major contracts clinched during the country's controversial arms deal were well
managed and had been successful, Public Enterprises Minister Alec Erwin
said.
Erwin yesterday brushed off allegations that top politicians
pocketed bribes from German firms who were bidding for the corvette part of the
deal.
The German media have reported that prosecuting authorities there
have raided the offices of companies involved in the deal on suspicions that
they had paid bribes.
Paying bribes in Germany in a bid to win defence
contracts only became illegal in that country in February1999. Before that, it
was accepted and earned companies tax breaks.
Questioned at a media
briefing about the allegations, Erwin said that since it was a German
investigation it would be wiser to wait for formal notification about what
exactly was being investigated.
He said South Africa would co-operate with
the investigation if asked by the Germans.
"We have not been informed
about any of those matters, but we will co-operate if we have to. We remain
confident that the major contracts *1 - not only were
they well managed, but I think these many years later have been very
successful."
Trade and Industry director-general Tshediso Matona said
the offset programmes of the arms deal which saw successful bidders invest in
the country were on track with only one exception.
With acknowledgements to Linda Daniels and Cape Times.
*1 Me thinks Minister Erwin seems
to think that only the major contracts were clean.
This logically means
that the sub-contracts were not necessarily clean.
But what is the
corvette combat suite contract, a major contract or a sub-contract?
And
then again, if investigations in Dusseldorf prove the suspicions, then the
corvette main contract is also not clean.
And what seems to be the case,
is that it is already accepted in Germany that the payment of Necessary Expenses
were indeed made - it's only a matter of whether the timing of their
authorisation meant that they constituted a criminal offence in German
law.
But in South African law, if Necessary Expenses were indeed made,
then whatever their timing they constitute a criminal offence in South African
law, specifically in this case, the Corruption Act, No. 94 of 1992.
It's
a bust.