Only a Neutral Jurist for the Zuma Trial can Avert Civil War |
Publication |
Cape Argus |
Date | 2008-01-21 |
Reporter |
Calvin Rix |
Web Link |
Letters
The
rule of law was elevated to one of the four pillars of South Africa's
constitution by its drafters. Yet if individuals are regarded as guilty and
pronounced as such by the chief guardian of the constitution, the rule of law is
weakened considerably, giving South Africans reason to be concerned.
President Thabo Mbeki claimed he had fired Jacob Zuma because of a
"court finding that there was a generally corrupt relationship between Zuma and
Schabir Shaik". This, after the judge, who allegedly made
this "finding", repeatedly explained that no such finding was made by him.*1
Those who argue that Zuma will not get a fair trial by South African
judges are correct, as the public has lost confidence in the legal system.*2
If South Africa is to avert a civil war, the ANC-led government
needs to declare a state of emergency, enabling the Zuma trial to get under way,
chaired by a respected jurist from another country, and where the media is
prohibited from commenting on the trial until its conclusion.
Failing
this, the ANC would do well to use its majority in the House of Assembly to
amend our constitution, prohibiting the indictment of the country's president,
the leaders of the ruling party and the majority opposition party, national and
provincial police commissioners and judges for the duration of their time in
office.
Calvin Rix
Strandfontein
With acknowledgements to Calvin Rix and Cape Argus.