SACP Fires New Salvo at NPA |
Publication |
Business Day |
Date | 2008-09-27 |
Reporter |
Karima Brown, Amy Musgrave, Franny Rabkin |
Web Link | www.bday.co.za |
Party seeks fresh Pikoli probe, and explanation of political
interference, write Karima Brown and Amy Musgrave
The South African Communist Party (SACP) wants a judicial inquiry into the
suspension of former head of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) Vusi
Pikoli.
It also wants Parliament to call the NPA "to account" for allowing political
interference in the investigation of African National Congress (ANC) leader
Jacob Zuma, and to lead a public debate on the NPA's future autonomy.
The SACP's call is the first salvo against the NPA
from the African National Congress (ANC) allies following the recall of former
president Thabo Mbeki.
The NPA has yet to announce whether it has decided to continue its fraud and
corruption prosecution against Zuma following Judge Chris Nicholson's judgment
two weeks ago.
Mbeki is seeking relief from the Constitutional Court following Nicholson's
suggestion that he interfered in the work of the NPA. In papers before the
court, Mbeki denie s interfering .
Pikoli is still awaiting the outcome of the Frene Ginwala inquiry into his
fitness to hold office. During the inquiry's public hearings, Pikoli submitted
evidence that Mbeki had interfered in his prosecution of suspended police
commissioner Jackie Selebi.
There is fierce debate in the ANC and its alliance partners on what the
relationship should be between the new executive and the National Directorate of
Public Prosecutions , and how to censure it for allowing meddling by its past
political masters.
ANC spokeswoman Jessie Duarte said on Friday that the party could not yet
respond to the call as it had not yet discussed the matter . "I am sure the SACP
will bring the matter to us in an alliance secretariat. After such a meeting we
will be in a position to respond comprehensively."
The SACP's push is likely to resonate among many ANC members who hold the view
that the NPA was used as a political tool in the party's leadership squabbles.
"It is going to be important to take swift action on all matters relating to the
improper political interference in the operations of the NPA by senior political
office-bearers, and also set in motion the necessary processes to get to the
bottom of all this," the party's general secretary, Blade Nzimande, said at its
policy conference on Friday.
"A very strong message needs to be sent out to the whole of society that at no
stage - now or in the future - should we allow organs of state to be used for
internal party-political machinations or to pursue narrow factionalist agendas."
Nzimande said Mbeki was implicated in the sacking of Pikoli and so could not
also be the final arbiter, through his appointment of Ginwala's inquiry, on
whether there was any wrongdoing.
Zuma and the NPA are opposing Mbeki's Constitutional Court application for leave
to appeal Nicholson's findings.
Nzimande told the SACP conference on Friday that the
spectre of Mbeki vs Zuma in the Constitutional Court was an "unpleasant"
development *1. The party also called on the cabinet to rethink appealing
Nicholson's judgment.
"The present Ginwala commission, handpicked by the very forces that appear to be
implicated in wrongdoing, is entirely inadequate," he said. "Judge Nicholson was
not required to make a definitive legal finding on this and other related
matters. It is now time to ensure that such a definitive finding is made."
The SACP believes the Nicholson judgment has "fundamental" implications for the
transformation and repositioning of the criminal justice system, especially the
NPA. "The SACP is also of the view that Parliament needs to take urgent steps to
call the NPA to account on the very many serious findings made by Judge
Nicholson," Nzimande said. "Most importantly, this must also be an opportunity
for Parliament to correct its very serious lapses in the past in not decisively
acting on the recommendations of the Public Protector in 2006.
"All Parliament did was to appoint an ad hoc committee which strangely only
endorsed the report without following up on the very specific recommendations
contained therein.
"For example, the public protector complained about the nonco-operation of the
then minister of justice (Penuel Maduna) and the national director of public
prosecutions (Bulelani Ngcuka) with his investigation and the disdain with which
the minister and director treated him." The public protector had investigated
leaks to the media from the NPA on its investigation of Zuma.
Nzimande said the current review of the criminal justice system had to be
rethought in the light of the Nicholson judgment.
"Clearly, the relationship between the prosecuting authority and political
office-bearers responsible for oversight of this institution is a matter for
urgent attention as part of this review.
"The executive interference referred to by Judge Nicholson was not news to those
of us in the ANC and broader alliance. Nor was it confined to the examples
provided by the judge... We have many more examples (of political interference),
more than the judge gave," Nzimande said.
n The national director of public prosecutions on Friday gave notice that he
would oppose Mbeki's application to the Constitutional Court to appeal
Nicholson's judgment because the prosecutions boss is bringing an appeal against
it to the Supreme Court of Appeal.
Senior Special Investigator Johan Du Plooy, on behalf of acting national
director of public prosecutions Mokotedi Mpshe, said in an affidavit to the
Constitutional Court that he intended to appeal "the entire judgment" of
Nicholson, including the findings concerning political interference.
In particular, Du Plooy said he intended to appeal "the high court's findings
concerning political meddling" in the Zuma prosecution which, if correct,
involved the noncompliance by the NPA with the
constitution and the National Prosecuting Authority Act *2.
But Du Plooy said Mbeki's application should not be heard independently of the
appeal process initiated by the NPA. He recommended that it be postponed
indefinitely and be enrolled only after the Supreme Court of Appeal avenue was
exhausted.
With acknowledgements to Karima Brown, Amy Musgrave, Franny Rabkin and Business Day.