Publication: Business Day Issued: Date: 2008-11-15 Reporter: Franny Rabkin

Mbeki, Government Apply to Join NPA Appeal

 

Publication 

Business Day

Date 2008-11-15

Reporter

Franny Rabkin

Web Link

www.businessday.co.za



Former president Thabo Mbeki and the government have applied to the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) to intervene in the National Prosecuting Authority’s (NPA’s) appeal against Judge Chris Nicholson’s judgment.

Alternatively, they have applied to join as “friends of the court”.

The application was made on Friday. In a supporting affidavit by Frank Chikane on behalf of the government, the cabinet secretary said he met President Kgalema Motlanthe and Justice Minister Enver Surty on October 10, where the decision to appeal against Nicholson’s judgment was confirmed.

Chikane said cabinet members were concerned about the effect of Nicholson’s judgment “on their ability to continue to serve this country with honour and dignity”.

Nicholson’s judgment set aside the NPA’s decision to prosecute African National Congress president Jacob Zuma, saying he had a constitutional right to make representations to the NPA before such a decision was taken.

In his judgment in the Pietermaritzburg High Court on September 12, Nicholson implied that Mbeki and other members of the executive had interfered politically in the work of the NPA.

Mbeki’s SCA appeal bid follows the dismissal of his application to appeal against Nicholson’s judgment at the Constitutional Court. The NPA’s appeal to the SCA is also contesting the parts of the judgment that dealt with political interference.

In his application, Mbeki said the SCA had “the inherent power and a duty to grant us leave to intervene to ensure that we, who have a direct and substantial interest in the subject matter of the appeal, and whose rights have, or may be affected by any judgment, including on appeal, are before the court and our interests are safeguarded”.

Mbeki did not detail in his application what his “direct and substantial interest” was, nor how an order or judgment of the SCA in the appeal would affect his rights.

The general rule in law is that only an actual court order may be appealed against.

With acknowledgements to Franny Rabkin and Business Day.




The irony (delicious or otherwise) of this whole debacle is that Judge Nicholson got it half wrong and half right, but for all the wrong reasons.

So far no one has challenged me on my reasoning why Mbeki chose not to become in involved when he could have and should have, i.e. at the High Court stage and not at the Supreme Court stage  (which he initially tried to side-step) or Constitutional Court stage.

But, legally-speaking, he lives in munjo gumbo land.

Still want to see this dweezil under cross-examination sometime soon, preferably first about how Thomson-CSF managed to sneak out of being tried for corruption after doing a dirty deal with Mbeki's men on the ground, Bulelani Ngcuka and Penuell Maduna and then a little, little later about Mbeki's own deal with Thomson-CSF in awarding them the lion's share of the corvette combat suite contract.

Can this please be arranged.