Justice Boss Faces Ginwala Fallout |
Publication |
Business Day |
Date | 2008-12-10 |
Reporter |
Ernest Mabuza |
Web Link |
Justice Minister Enver Surty said yesterday he had asked the Public Service
Commission to investigate the department’s director-general Menzi Simelane,
whose conduct the Ginwala inquiry found to be highly irregular.
Frene Ginwala, who compiled a report on suspended national director of public
prosecutions Vusi Pikoli’s fitness to hold office, found Simelane’s conduct left
much to be desired.
She said Simelane’s personal views had informed the complaints against Pikoli,
and formed part of the government’s submission to the inquiry. President Kgalema
Motlanthe announced Pikoli’s axing on Monday, and referred Ginwala’s findings on
Simelane to Surty for follow-up.
Surty said he regarded the Ginwala findings as
very serious as public
servants had constitutional imperatives
that included a high standard of professional ethics, accountability and
transparency. He said that the commission was best placed to deal with the
issue. “This will ensure a thorough investigation to take place.”
The minister said he expected a report by the end of next month or February.
Simelane would remain in his post during the probe.
In her report, Ginwala expressed displeasure at Simelane’s conduct in the
preparation of government submissions and in his oral testimony, which she found
in many respects to be inaccurate or
without any basis in fact and law.
“He was forced to concede
during cross-examination that the allegations he made against Adv Pikoli were
without foundation,”
Ginwala said.
The government’s complaints related to matters such as the performance agreement
between Simelane and the head of the National Prosecuting Authority and the way
the Scorpions dealt with its labour issues. “All these complaints against Adv
Pikoli were spurious,
and are rejected without substance,
and may have been motivated by personal
issues,” Ginwala said.
Ginwala said Simelane’s failure to include
all the relevant material at his disposal in the original
government submission was not consonant with the responsibilities of a senior
official giving information to an inquiry set up by the president.
“His testimony before the inquiry was also not particularly helpful to me; his
evidence was contradictory,
and I found him to be arrogant
and condescending
in his attitude towards Adv Pikoli,” she said.
With acknowledgements to Ernest Mabuza and Business Day.