Publication: Mail and Guardian Issued: Date: 2008-12-12 Reporter: Sam Sole

Mabandla Could Face Anti-Meddling Action

 

Publication 

Mail and Guardian

Date

2008-12-12

Reporter Sam Sole

Web Link

www.mg.co.za




Former justice minister Brigitte Mabandla, now minister of public enterprises, could face the full force of the law for allegedly meddling in the prosecution of police boss Jackie Selebi. It will now be up to the police to decide whether there is a prima facie case of interference in the work of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) against her, after Independent Democrats leader Patricia de Lille lodged a complaint at the Cape Town central police station this week.

This follows President Kgalema Motlanthe’s release of the Ginwala inquiry report into suspended prosecutions boss Vusi Pikoli’s fitness to hold office. Although former parliamentary speaker Frene Ginwala found Pikoli to be a fit and proper person to lead the NPA, Motlanthe announced he would ask Parliament to fire Pikoli on the strength of Ginwala’s concerns about his regard for national security.

The report is scathing about justice Director General Menzi Simelane’s role in Pikoli’s suspension. Ginwala specifically criticises him for his role in drafting a letter to Pikoli that instructed him to halt the investigation and prosecution of police National Commissioner Jackie Selebi. The letter was signed by Mabandla.

The letter was central to Pikoli’s claim that former president Thabo Mbeki suspended him to frustrate the Selebi probe.

Simelane admitted during cross-examination that he had prepared the document.

The Ginwala report quotes Mabandla saying in affidavit that “it was not her intention to stop advocate Pikoli from discharging his duties or performing his functions as national director of public prosecutions. Assuming this is correct, the conduct of [Simelane] in drafting the document in the manner it reads was reckless, to say the least.”

Ginwala says Simelane should have been “acutely” aware of the constitutional protection afforded to the NPA to conduct its work without fear, favour or prejudice.

“The contents of the letter were tantamount to
executive interference with the prosecutorial independence of the NPA, which is recognised as a serious offence in the [NPA] Act.”

It was this section of the report that prompted De Lille to lay charges against Mabandla. Under section 32(1)(b) of the NPA Act it is an offence to interfere with, hinder or obstruct the prosecuting authority or any member of it in the performance of their functions.

Conviction carries an unlimited fine, imprisonment for up to 10 years or both.

De Lille says she decided to charge Mabandla because she signed the letter and was ultimately responsible for its content.

“Many of the
leaders in the ANC and government think that they are above the law... MPs are here to make the law, not break it.”

Earlier this week Justice Minister Enver Surty referred the Ginwala report to the Public Service Commission to make recommendations on possible steps against Simelane.

With acknowledgements to Sam Sole and Mail and Guardian.

And Penuell Maduna before her.