India’s ‘boycott’ costs Denel |
Publication |
Sunday Times |
Date | 2009-06-20 |
Reporter | Mpumelelo Mkhabela |
Web Link | www.thetimes.co.za |
"'We have been blacklisted, not officially, but the behaviour shows’ ‘They
don’t invite us to tender, they cancel existing contracts’"
Arms parastatal says relations frosty since questions arose over procedure
during contract procurement
South Africa’s state-owned arms manufacturer, Denel, has lost R2-billion
in revenue after it was “blacklisted” from
selling weapons to India *1. The company plans to seek
diplomatic assistance from the SA government to recapture the Indian market.
On Wednesday, the para-statal’s group executive for business development,
Zwelakhe Ntshepe, told the parliamentary portfolio committee on public
enterprises: “We have been blacklisted, not officially, but the behaviour shows.
They don’t invite us to tender, they cancel existing contracts. It’s been going
on for the past four years.”
Denel has not received invitations to tender for any Indian government armament
contracts since 2005, after allegations surfaced that it had earlier
paid “commissions” for a deal to supply rifles *2.
The struggling arms
manufacturer, which survives mainly on
government bailouts, disclosed the losses to parliament
this week when it appeared alongside other state-owned enterprises that had been
called to explain their financial standing and strategies.
But Ntshepe and group financial director Fikile Mhlontlo did not tell parliament
nor were they asked about the allegations that
Denel had paid “commissions” to Indian officials
to secure arms deals.
Mhlontlo told the Sunday Times later that the dispute arose after queries were
raised by Indian authorities about “procedure in the procurement process”. This
related to a certain question in a questionnaire Denel had to complete during
the procurement process in 1999 to which the company was expected to give a
“yes” or “no” answer. He said Denel provided an answer that was queried by the
Indian authorities in 2004, but declined to reveal the nature of the dispute.
It is understood it was about whether or not Denel had used agents and paid
“commissions” to secure a contract that included the supply of rifles. Denel has
previously declined to comment on the allegations,
citing confidentiality clauses in the contract *3.
A document submitted to the portfolio committee, mapping Denel’s market share,
pointed to India as a “no-go market”. Among other things, Denel attributed its
losses between 2005 and 2008 to a shrinkage of export markets, including India.
Ntshepe told the committee that the company was undergoing arbitration with the
Indian authorities in a bid to resolve the dispute. He said that the Indian
authorities had investigated Denel and had
not charged the company with wrongdoing *4.
Diplomatic efforts by the government had failed to resolve
the matter. Ntshepe said there had been “an attempt at some point” by the South
African government to talk to its Indian counterpart, who had responded that it
was an issue between the state and Denel. He said Denel was considering to again
call for a diplomatic solution between the South African and the Indian
governments.
Asked by the committee’s chairman, Mabel Mentor, whether the government’s
relations with India through the India-Brazil-South Africa tri-nation diplomatic
platform have not helped the situation, Ntshepe replied that relations with
India were “difficult”.
The admission about India’s shunning of Denel has come in the same week that
minister of international relations and co-operation Maite Nkoana-Mashabane
spoke of strong bilateral relations between the two countries. “With India, we
share strong historical relations spanning through the 20th century. Ours has
been a relationship steeped in politics and struggle,” she said during her
department’s budget vote debate.
Denel has posted losses every year since
1998 *5. In 2006 during which it lost R1.3-billion the
government injected R2-billion into Denel, in addition to R1.5-billion in loan
guarantees.
The company’s losses have since been declining. In 2007 and 2008 it lost
R549-million and R347-million respectively.
mkhabelam@sundaytimes.co.za
With acknowledgements to Mpumelelo Mkhabela and Sunday Times.