Cabinet Questions Delay Piracy Decision |
Publication |
defenceWeb |
Date | 2009-03-09 |
Reporter | Leon Engelbrecht |
Web Link |
Defence minister Charles Nqakula says a set of
unanswered questions *1 is
preventing Cabinet from deciding the question of South Africa’s participation in
counter-piracy operations “one way or the other.”
Nqakula was answering media questions at a press conference on the sidelines of
the SA Nay’s 3rd Sea Power for Africa symposium.
“It is true there is a discussion in Cabinet about this. The problem with
governance is that you do not get all the answers you require for action … all
the time … as speedily as possible.
“There are a number of outstanding questions with respect to this particular
matter and the consequence is that in the absence of the answers we are
expecting we are unable to decide this matter one way or another. It is
therefore still with cabinet awaiting those answers to the questions we have
posed.”
He would not say to whom the questions had
been posed or what the questions are. The minister would also not elaborate on
when the questions would be answered *2.
“It won’t be correct to state what the questions are or to whom they have been
posed,” he said.
“As SA we need to have an understanding what our role will be so that we can go
to Parliament because every time we have to deploy, we must get authorisation in
terms of our law. Now, we can’t go to Parliament with a case that is not
watertight. This is what we are preparing for.”
Observers at the conference have noted that 23 countries –
none of them African – have
pledged or deployed ships to patrol the
Gulf of Aden and adjacent waters,
where well over a hundred incidents of piracy were reported last year.
Pirates, mostly operating from lawless Somalia, Somaliland and Puntland,
hijacked ships and extracted millions of US dollars as ransom from ship owners.
In addition, hundreds of sailors were taken hostage and several murdered, with
scores injured in pirate attacks that have also pushed up maritime insurance
premiums and forced ships to round the Cape to Europe or Asia rather than use
the Suez Canal and Red Sea. This has, in turn, pushed up consumer prices, also
in Africa.
The SA Navy has on a number of occasions declared itself ready and able to show
the flag and has briefed Cabinet accordingly. But
a source says they received a cold audience and
were told not to presume to dictate foreign policy to Cabinet either directly or
through the media.
SA is one of a handful of African states that have the capacity and legislative
framework to respond. Section 24 of the Defence Act of 2002 allows the SANDF to
arrest pirates on the High Seas and bring them before the country’s courts. In
addition, Section 10 of the nation’s antiterrorist law, the Protection of
Constitutional Democracy against Terrorist and Related Activities Act of 2004,
outlaws the hijacking of ships.
The act is also extraterritorial in
jurisdiction.
No-one at the symposium has been able to
explain the slow haste Cabinet is making.
With acknowledgements to Leon Engelbrecht and defenceWeb.