Desai admits Shaik parole damaged credibility of parole system |
Publication |
Business Day |
Date | 2009-11-04 |
Reporter | Sapa |
Web Link | www.bday.co.za |
Correctional Supervision and Parole Review Board chairman Judge Siraj Desai
today renewed his call for a review of the medical parole system.
Desai conceded in a National Assembly's correctional services committee meeting
today that Schabir Shaik's controversial release on medical parole had
damaged the credibility *1
of the parole system.
Democratic Alliance spokesman James Selfe welcomed Desai's call to amend laws
governing medical parole.
"The decision to grant Schabir Shaik medical parole has become an extremely
controversial matter as it is believed that Mr Shaik did not qualify for release
in terms of the provisions of the Act," Selfe said.
This scepticism undermined the credibility of the parole system as a whole,
something Desai had conceded.
As the law now stood, only the correctional services minister or the
commissioner could refer a parole decision for review.
The DA had requested both the former and current ministers to refer Shaik's
parole decision for review, but these requests were refused.
Selfe said Desai had now suggested the law be amended to allow the national
council for corrections to be given the power to review parole decisions if the
appropriate representations were made.
"These suggested changes go a long way toward making the parole process more
transparent and credible.
"The DA welcomes these suggestions and will endorse any such changes.
"South Africa currently has two parole systems; one for the rich and politically
connected and another for those that do not have connections and are often
ignored.
"These amendments are necessary if any further political influences in the
parole system are to be avoided," Selfe said.
In March this year, when Shaik was released on medical parole, apparently being
in the final stages of a terminal illness, Desai said medical parole was meant
only for people who were terminally ill, not those suffering from lesser
conditions.
In an interview on radio station Cape Talk at the time said: "There is no
elasticity in the Act in so far as it concerns medical illnesses generally."
He said then the Correctional Services Act as it stood was not ideal.
"There is absolutely no reason to detain somebody who is not a danger to
society, but very ill and keep them in custody.
"I personally am of the view that the Act should be amended to broaden the scope
on which we can release medically unfit persons from prison."
With acknowledgements to Sapa and Business Day.