Motlanthe Declines “Arms Deal” Probe |
Publication |
defenceWeb |
Date | 2008-12-10 |
Reporter |
Franny Rabkin, Hajra Omarjee |
Web Link |
President Kgalema Motlanthe has decided not to investigate ongoing
allegations of impropriety surrounding the R47 billion 1999 Strategic Defence
Package.
Anglican Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu and former head of state FW de
Klerk petitioned Motlanthe last week to appoint “an independent and public
judicial commission of inquiry” into claims of bribery and corruption related to
the acquisition of 50 fighter aircraft, 30 light utility helicopters, four
frigates and three submarines for R47.4 billion, the current Treasury figure,
payable over 12 years.
The two Nobel Laureates wanted Motlanthe to act by today,
the 60th International Human Rights Day.
“There should also be an investigation into the possibility of cancelling arms
deal contracts tainted by corrupt and fraudulent dealings, and recovery of
payments already made,” the two add in a co-signed letter.
The South African Press Association reports Motlanthe is convinced that a
commission of inquiry would not be an appropriate tool to investigate alleged
criminal activities during the arms deals.
"There is already an investigation in some of these matters and we are
confident that our law enforcement agencies are capable of handling any
allegations pertaining to the arms deal," his spokesman Thabo Masebe says.
Masebe says a letter will be sent to Tutu and De Klerk informing them
about Motlanthe’s decision. The letter will be made public. Tutu and de Klerk’s
call received support from clergymen, academics, authors, activists and
politicians.
“Government has always maintained that if anyone has information
implicating individuals in the arms deal, then that person should forward such
information to law enforcement agencies," Masebe adds.
De Klerk Foundation spokesman Dave Steward this afternoon told defenceWeb
they had not yet received the latter and could not comment further. An official
at Tutu’s office said the same.
SDP critic and CCII CEO Richard Young says he is
disappointed. “There must be something to hide. That’s the only logical
conclusion,” he adds.
Young also scoffed at Masebe’s call for parties to forward information to
the authorities. He says he has been doing so for years
without any result, most recently in March when he again wrote to the National
Prosecuting Authority. He notes that nine months later the sole response has
been an acknowledgement of receipt.
Democratic Alliance (DA) public accounts spokesman Eddie Trent says he
notes Motlanthe’s decision “with great disappointment, but
little surprise.”
Trent says the allegations of wrongdoing surrounding the [SDP] go to the
heart of the issue of corruption in South Africa. Until it is dealt with
immediately, in the right forum, and with a robust and thorough investigation,
the arms deal will continue to resurface like a cancer
eating away at the body politic…”
With acknowledgements to Leon Engelbrecht and defenceWeb.