Publication: Daily Mail
Issued:
Date: 2009-10-02
Reporter: Matthew Hickley
Reporter: Rupert Steiner
BAE Systems dogfight on bribery
charges as arms giant battles to save 30,000 UK jobs
after fraud office vows to
prosecute |
Publication |
Daily Mail
|
Date |
2009-10-02 |
Reporter |
Matthew Hickley
Rupert Steiner |
Web Link |
www.dailymail.co.uk |
Defence giant BAE Systems has pledged to fight Britain's largest corruption
case to save tens of thousands of jobs.
The Serious Fraud Office yesterday announced plans to prosecute the arms
contractor over alleged bribes linked to a string of deals around the world.
The firm has been involved in months of negotiations with the SFO, but has so
far refused to agree on a plea bargain and a fine.
Probe: BAE Systems helps build the Eurofighter Typhoon, above. The arms giant is
accused of using bribes worth hundreds of millions of pounds to win deals in
South Africa, the Czech Republic, Romania and Tanzania
Last night legal experts accused the SFO of using strong-arm tactics to bully
BAE into submission and said the draconian move would cripple a strategically
vital British company.
Insiders said BAE had ruled out any deal if it involved the company receiving a
criminal conviction for corruption.
They fear this would bar them from bidding
for U.S. and EU military contracts - effectively cutting them off from their
biggest markets.
Arms giant: Domes of the Astute nuclear powered submarine being
constructed by BAE for the Ministry of Defence
BAE is the world's second largest arms company, employing 105,000 workers,
including 32,000 in the UK.
It supplies personal equipment for British soldiers, and warships, fighter jets
and submarines to more than 100 countries.
More...
But despite its huge commercial success the company has been blighted by
allegations of corruption involving billions of pounds in kickbacks and bribes
paid to foreign officials to secure huge deals.
The latest investigation centres on contracts BAE Systems won from Tanzania, the
Czech Republic, Romania and South Africa between 1999 and 2004, and could lead
to charges under the 2001 Prevention of Corruption Act.
BAE chairman Dick Olver, then chief executive Mike Turner and group finance
director George Rose in 2004. Mr Turner has since been replaced by Ian King
Two years ago British ministers caused uproar by halting the Serious Fraud
Office's investigation of alleged corruption surrounding BAE's massive
£43billion Al Yamamah arms deal with Saudi Arabia, claiming the probe was
against Britain's national interest. But inquiries into the other allegations
were allowed to continue.
Well-placed sources have revealed that the SFO and BAE Systems have been locked
in tense negotiations for months, with the prosecutors seeking a guilty plea
while threatening fines of between £ 500million and £1billion.
With no deal reached, SFO bosses eventually lost patience and set a deadline
which expired on Wednesday night.
In a sign of the extreme political sensitivity surrounding the case, sources
have described how in recent weeks Downing Street, the Ministry of Justice and
the Attorney General's office have all put pressure on the SFO to make its
intentions clear and 'liaise more closely' with ministers - pressure which was
resisted by the agency's director Richard Alderman.
The SFO has already spent £ 4.3million on the investigations.
Attorney General Baroness Scotland - herself under pressure for employing an
illegal immigrant as her housekeeper - must now decide whether to approve or
block the prosecution.
In a statement yesterday BAE said: 'If the Director of the SFO obtains the
consent that he seeks from the Attorney General and proceedings are commenced,
the company will deal with any issues raised in those proceedings at the
appropriate time and, if necessary, in court.'
George Brown, an expert on global regulation at law firm Reed Smith, said the
SFO faced an 'uphill struggle' to secure convictions.
He said: 'To get a prosecution of the company you have to prove that the person
who is the controlling mind and body of the company was involved in making the
decisions.
If there is a board of directors and there is dispersal of management . . . that
is virtually impossible.'
Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1217300/BAE-Systems-set-charged-Serious-Fraud-Office-presses-ahead-aircraft-bribery-probe.html#ixzz0SnPFQtLQ
With acknowledgements to
Matthew Hickley, Rupert Steiner
and Daily Mail.