NPA has quite a lot of explaining to do |
Publication |
Business Day |
Date | 2009-03-21 |
Reporter | Xolela Mangcu |
Web Link | www.bday.co.za |
It looks like the NPA is going to have to dig deep into its historical memory
and do “a Bulelani Ngcuka” in explaining
why it cannot go after both Jacob Zuma and Thabo Mbeki.
Remember how Ngcuka said there was prima facie evidence of corruption against
Zuma but that he would not prosecute because the case was unwinnable?
Well, with a little bit of improvisation, the director of public prosecutions,
Adv Mokotedi Mpshe, might approach the press conference to say that in addition
to the “prima facie” against Zuma, another “prima facie” has now emerged against
Mbeki, and there may be other “prima facies” on the way. Too many prima facies,
he may protest in exasperation.
I can sympathise with the guy. We don’t want the former president and the
sitting president meeting and exchanging notes on the steps of the courts.
Imagine Mbeki asking Zuma: “So how’s the prosecutor today, Msholozi, is he in a
bad mood?”
Zuma chuckles: “He was well balanced, my brother. Very balanced, indeed.”
There have been endless allegations of speculation about Mbeki’s involvement in
corruption relating to the arms deal.
If those allegations were true
then that would also explain why winning
at Polokwane would have been so important to him. The
argument has been that if he were to win then he could turn the spotlight away
from his involvement and simply finish Zuma off.
But that would have been the height of self-delusion the idea that you can
drive political rivals to the precipice in the hope that they will fall off. As
it turns out Zuma seems to be quite a survivor.
But, hey, whatever differences I may have with Mbeki, I do not want to see him
go to jail, let alone being hauled into a courtroom.
It would not be in the public interest to have a sitting and former president in
court. However, it would be in the public interest to have a commission of
inquiry with those who benefited being asked to pay back any improper benefits
or facing some sort of censure, whether that’s Mbeki or Zuma.
With acknowledgements to Xolela Mangcu and Business Day.