Zille: Zuma Case to Bring Down Government |
Publication |
Sunday Independent |
Date | 2009-03-27 |
Reporter | Barry Bateman |
Web Link |
Withdrawing the case against ANC President Jacob Zuma could spell the end of the
rule of law in South Africa, according to the DA.
Speaking to the media outside the offices of the National Prosecuting Authority
(NPA) after handing over her party's representations, DA leader Helen Zille said
Zuma supposedly argued that if he is to be brought down, others must be brought
down too.
"If this is indeed the basis of Zuma's representations, this actually aggravates
the case against him," Zille said.
"He is asking for a cover-up because the evidence in open court could bring down
the government. The prospect that the NPA could be complicit in such a cover-up
would mean the end of the rule of law in South Africa."
Acting NPA head Mokotedi Mpshe was not available to accept the representations.
However his secretary, "Jackie", was kind enough to accept them on his behalf.
"I was treated very politely," said Zille.
She said if any incumbent in any office of the state acted unlawfully in the
circumstances surrounding the investigation of Zuma, they should be charged too.
Zille argued that the alleged wrongdoings of other government officials cannot
be used as an excuse to nullify the corruption, bribery, money laundering and
racketeering charges against Zuma.
The DA's representations tackled four aspects, namely the role of the NPA under
the constitution; the presumption of innocence; the legitimacy of the criminal
justice system; and Zuma's constitutional rights.
Zille said if the NPA dropped the charges the public would have a right to know
on what basis the charges were withdrawn.
She said if such an explanation was not forthcoming, it could be concluded that
the NPA and Zuma entered into a mutually
beneficial deal in exchange for the charges being withdrawn.
"This would be a disaster for South Africa. It would give free rein to the
powerful to engage in corruption, and encourage a context of
generalised lawlessness."
With acknowledgements to