SA Forces 'On Downward Spiral' |
Publication |
Jane's Defence Weekly |
Date | 2009-03-25 |
Reporter | Helmoed-Romer Heitman |
After several days of briefings on the readiness of the South African National
Defence Force (SANDF) the country's parliamentary portfolio committee on defence
warned on March 11 that the SANDF is in a "downward spiral of becoming
inadequate to fulfil its constitutional mandate.
The committee said that SANDF had arrived at a "cross- roads" and that a
decision must be taken on whether it will remain a "finance-driven defence force
or a mandate-driven defence force".
The committee called for the defence budget to be increased from its current
level of about 1,2 percent of GDP to 1,7 percent over the next four years and
for "all possible efforts'' to ensure that the available limited resources are
effectively directed towards "national defence priorities".
"In addition to the above-mentioned recommendation, a decision to modernise the
SA Army is needed and this must be funded as a matter of urgency," the report
said.
Senior members of the SANDF have warned repeatedly over the past few years that
the forces were suffering severe strain as a result of inadequate funding. The
army is too small *2 to sustain its current
deployments and lacks the funding to maintain and train effectively, let alone
to proceed even with all of its urgent equipment projects.
Re-equipment has stalled, resulting in the potential for
block obsolescence and rising maintenance costs. The only current major
projects are a partial replacement of the Ratel ICV fleet (264 Badger ICVs) and
a very limited re-equipment of air defence units. The acquisition of new
tactical logistic vehicles as envisioned under Project Vistula and APCs (Project
Sapula) are both well behind schedule.
The air force has slipped *3 behind in maintaining
systems and infrastructure and lacks the funds to pay adequate incentives to
retain aircrew and technicians.
Similarly the navy lacks sufficient operating funds *4
and faces a restricted allocation for its planned offshore patrol vessel project
and no funds yet programmed for joint support ships needed to facilitate
short-notice deployments in Africa.
Another recommendation is that members of the Army's reserve force - which is to
form the bulk of conventional - should "participate in a conventional exercise
every three years, starting at unit level and building up to a combined
formation exercise" and that the budget for this should be ring-fenced.
The Army last conducted a fullscale brigade exercise more than a decade ago, the
recent exercises all having involved less than half a brigade's worth of forces.
Lawmakers were also keen for "greater communication between the political
authority and the SANDF "to ensure adequate resources, equipment and funding to
fulfill the armed forces' mandate, "especially as the SANDF is obviously being
used as a foreign policy tool".
The report also addressed the need to cultivate "a
sophisticated local defence industry" *5 which it considered "crucial
for the SANDF *6 to maintain the necessary state of readiness in the most
cost-effective manner", and urged the Department of Defence to develop a
framework for the restructuring of the industry.
With acknowledgements to
Helmoed-Romer Heitman and Jane's Defence Weekly.