Tapes were NPA’s way out of tight spot |
Publication |
Business Day |
Date | 2009-04-11 |
Reporter | Tim Cohen |
Web Link | www.bday.co.za |
The general consensus of opinion in unaffiliated circles seems to be that
the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) marginally demonstrated it was
justified in withdrawing the charges against African National Congress (ANC)
president Jacob Zuma.
But was it?
We must assume that the NPA presented the most telling evidence . The
transcripts are short : over 30 conversations fill a few typed pages. They are
edited extracts, many meandering and pretty meaningless.
But they are very embarrassing for former Scorpions boss Leonard McCarthy and
former NPA head Bulelani Ngcuka.
For the head of the Scorpions to be discussing the timing of a court case with a
political actor was horribly indiscreet. But indiscretion does not necessarily
constitute manipulation.
NPA acting national director Mokotedi Mpshe clearly pins the blame on McCarthy.
He says: “McCarthy, who was head of the DSO (Directorate of Special Operations),
and was in charge of the matter at all times and managed it almost on a daily
basis, manipulated the legal process for purposes outside and extraneous to the
prosecution itself.”
Yet the conversations don’t reveal that McCarthy did anything of the sort they
could easily suggest the opposite.
It was apparently Ngcuka’s argument that if the NPA brought the charges before
Polokwane, it would play into the hands of Zuma’s supporters who would claim a
conspiracy.
The charges were reinstated only after Polokwane, so it seems Ngcuka got his
way. Ironically, in his judgment supporting the notion of political
interference, Judge Chris Nicholson took an adverse implication from the
decision to charge Zuma so soon after the ANC conference.
But the tapes do not suggest McCarthy was in favour of this strategy. Take this
exchange for example:
LM: Up until Friday, I received a strong memorandum to say charge and charge now
BN: Friday
LM: No this Friday, the team says we have been f**king around with this thing,
we are allowing ulterior considerations to come in, it will become an
impossibility later we now must take action and deal with “finish and klaar”
as Jackie Selebi says, but we will talk when I see you.
It’s not impossible that McCarthy changed his mind and went along with Ngcuka’s
plan. But delaying the decision to reinstate the charges was the more
considerate thing to do. To reinstate so soon before a political vote would have
been extremely crass.
If Nicholson could sense a conspiracy from the NPA’s decision to reinstate the
charges just after Polokwane, imagine what he might have imputed if it had done
so just before the conference?
Interestingly, the NPA interprets this passage completely differently. In the
margins of the transcript the following is noted: “Appears as if BN requested
that LM obtain the view of the team to bolster the argument that charges should
be brought before Polokwane (in case it was needed)”.
This seems a massively extrapolated
conclusion to draw from a snippet of conversation. The
more obvious conclusion is that McCarthy was arguing against Ngcuka that the law
should take its course unhindered. He accuses Ngcuka of
“allowing ulterior considerations to come in”.
The tapes show McCarthy was a strong supporter of former president Thabo Mbeki,
which is not ideal, although presumably
not a crime. In his conversation with Mbeki, McCarthy says
“you will always be my president”. But this was after Mbeki suggested that some
described him after Polokwane as “former president”. McCarthy was simply being
polite .
The decision to charge and when to charge was not McCarthy’s to take, and
neither did he take it. McCarthy was an investigator, not a prosecutor. The
prosecutor was Mpshe . But now Mpshe is effectively saying he was
manipulated into doing the right thing.
The transcripts don’t say very much and suggest affiliations that are obvious.
The conversations are like Rorschach blot pictures: they tend to reinforce
preconceived ideas. For a humiliated and cornered prosecution service, the blot
looked very much like a convenient way out of a tough spot.
With acknowledgements to Tim Cohen and Business Day.