BAE: a hawk’s foresight |
Publication |
Business Day |
Date | 2011-07-06 |
Reporter | Wallace Mayne - Letters Correspondent |
Web Link | www.bday.co.za |
If the African National Congress’s (ANC’s) Western Cape dandy, Tony
Yengeni, is not feeling like a fool given the latest revelations of the
amount of money sloshing around SA’s criminal arms deal then it appears
that after 500 years, trinkets have lost none of their allure.
A 5% discount on a mall-crawler that loses a quarter of its value when it
rolls off the forecourt suggests the currency of shiny beads still remains
valid, and no doubt had the colonial arms
dealers sniggering into their G&Ts at London’s Reform Club *1 about
how cheaply an MK fighter sells out for.
To give Fana Hlongwane credit beyond the alleged hundreds of millions of
rand paid in "bonuses" by BAE he at least recognised the importance of the
South African arms deal for the future of the Hawk training jets.
SA then was the only deal in town and if BAE had not secured the sale of the
1960s technology to "modernise" SA’s air force, then the production line
would have closed, and so with it any chance of "competing" for the Indian
arms deal.
In the event, the Hawks production line was thrown a lifeline by the South
African arms deal that kept it moving, and in 2004 India bought 66 Hawks,
and in 2010 a further 57 Hawks were purchased.
Such foresight no doubt comes with a premium for BAE.
But what probably raised more than a chuckle at the Reform Club’s bar was
SA’s audacity in naming its alleged "elite crime-fighting unit" The Hawks. I
am told the English enjoy irony.
Wallace Mayne
Troyeville
With acknowledgements to Business Day and Wallace Mayne.
My genes are
74% English, 25% Scottish and 1% street, but these Brit trough fillers
disgust me infinitely more than the Yengenis, Shaiks, Hlongwanes, Pierces,
Zumas, Charters, Matherss, Swans, Ellingfords, Molois, Molais, Modises,
Deetlefss, Spains, Simple-Anderssons, Bredenkamps, Goergadiss, McDonalds,
inter alia trough feeders.
But it's good to see a bit of intelligence coming back into the Arms Deal
debate - the place where it all started.
Apart from the R60 billion cost of the Arms Deal (make than R600 billion in
lifecycle costs), just think of Denel.
Denel cost this country's taxpayers several hundred billion to set up.
At first it did us proud (actually when it was still Armscor) and built and
delivered the materiel for an entire world-class defence force of 150 000
men who took on and whipped FAPLA and their East German, Russian and Cuban
masters (shame about the Mirages).
Yet now after the Arms Deal Denel firstly sells the family silver and then
slouches off with its tail between its legs to beg R5 billion from
Parliament every year to keep it solvent (where does all this money actually
go?).
Yet Atlas Aviation, later Denel Nicampoop Corporation built nearly 240
Impala trainer and strike jets for the SAAF, all licensed from Aermacci of
Italy. It was capitalised and geared to make and maintain these low cost
jets with taxpayers' funds.
Aermacchi's new MD339 was just a newer 1990s model in the range and the
Nicampoop's could easily have at least sourced and maintained the aircraft,
even if the quantity of 24 was too low to undertake licensed manufacture.
Actually Aermacci's price for its MD339 was so low because it actually had
some flyable aircraft (white tails) ready to go after a slight
over-production on another deal.
An it's true that the Hawk is 1960s technology, except a strange thing
happened in the Arms Deal where the SAAF ordered the Hawk 100, but ended up
getting and paying for the Hawk 120. Did the Auditor-General pick upon that?
The MD339 was not only substantially less expensive than the BAE Hawks,
about 45%, but it flies much more like a modern jet fighter (like a Gripen
or F16) than a flying goose.
Modise and his mates Hlongwane and Chippy Shaik, all aided and abetted by
Thabo Mbeki, Ronnie Kasrils, Alec Erwin, Stella Stigau and crew, claimed the
BAE Hawk had higher military value because it had hard points for the
affixing of weapons. Well firstly this was not a specified SAAF requirement
and secondly, even if it was, even the Nicampoops could have modified the
MD339 to carry an air-to-air missile on each wing and possibly a couple of
dumb 250 kg bombs (which now work really well with their GPS guidance
collars and fins).