Zuma: Heath no friend of mine |
Publication |
Sunday Times |
Date | 2011-12-11 |
Reporter | Sibusiso Ngalwa, Thabo Mokone |
Web Link | www.timeslive.co.za |
Pressure Is mounting on Special Investigating Unit (SIU) head Willem
Heath, with the government confirming that he is being investigated and
President Jacob Zuma saying the former judge is "not a friend".
Justice Minister Jeff Radebe said yesterday he was investigating remarks
made by Heath in an interview last week and hoped to report back to the
president in the next few days.
Heath told City Press last week that former president Thabo Mbeki had
engineered rape and corruption charges against Zuma. This prompted an angry
response from Mbeki, who denied the "grave" claims.
In an interview with Ukhozi FM on Wednesday, Zuma strongly denied having
close ties to Heath. The former judge acted as Zuma's legal adviser when the
president faced a rape charge and, later, when he was charged with
corruption.
"When you hire a lawyer it doesn't mean that he is your friend ... sometimes
you hire a lawyer to represent you and the next day you find him standing on
the other side. That's how lawyers operate, they serve whoever comes first
and requests help," said Zuma.
The president distanced himself from Heath's claims that Mbeki had
instigated the criminal cases that threatened to end Zuma's political
career.
"He is not aligned to me ... I want to deny that ... he has his own views.
He holds his own views on what happened, you know that he was always
involved in the investigations field even before.
"It may well be that there are some things that he knows that we don't. That
is why I'm saying that his comments ... have made us to look into them
because we have to satisfy ourselves that if he holds such views and such
emotions ... given the sensitive job that he has been given, if he will be
able to work properly," said Zuma.
"Because of the position he is appointed to, it is crucial for the nation to
be assured that he holds no grudges and that he will do his job properly,"
said Zuma.
Radebe yesterday said that he and Department of Justice director-general
Nonkululeko Sindane had met Heath on Tuesday "to obtain information ... in
order to fully understand" the circumstances under which the interview took
place.
"Advocate Heath undertook to provide me with relevant information on this
matter and has recently handed over information to my office on this matter
for consideration," said Radebe.
"At the outset he strongly indicated that the interview was conducted in his
personal capacity and not in his professional capacity as the head of the
SIU."
Presidential spokesman Mac Maharaj told the Sunday Times on Friday that
Zuma's office was in touch with Mbeki's office following a formal complaint
from the former president.
Heath's comments have also irked Bulelani Ngcuka, the former National
Director of Public Prosecutions.
In today's Sunday Times, Ngcuka addresses an "open letter" to Heath, saying
that the allegations made were "very serious".
"Evidence of such conduct as you allege on my part would result in a
criminal conviction. One therefore wonders why, if you have such evidence,
you have not seen it fit to formally lay charges against me in all these
years.
"The reason, in my considered view, is that these allegations are as false
as they are disingenuous," writes Ngcuka, who describes Heath as a man
driven by bitterness.
"One however understands that a man so bitter at being 'excluded' from
office and being rendered a pauper as a result of such 'exclusion' would be
blind to the facts and be inclined to lash out at all those who he
misguidedly perceives to have conspired to his prejudice," he writes.
Heath had to quit his job as head of the SIU in 2000 after the
Constitutional Court ruled that a sitting judge could not head up such a
unit.
He then applied to Mbeki for early retirement but the former president
turned him down, and he lost lucrative benefits such as a salary for life.
With acknowledgements to Sibusiso Ngalwa, Thabo Mokone and Sunday Times.
Advocate Heath is not an arsehole, his boss is. The latter is also a liar.
How can the former not be his friend when otherwise the latter would surely
be in jail.
The only idiocy Advocate Heath has demonstrated of late is saying the
Schabir Shaik should not have been found guilty as there was insufficient
evidence.
Judge Hilary Squires's judgment is one of the best and most thorough
judgments ever given in a criminal trial ever in any jurisdication anywhere
in the world.
I said so because it is so.
So effectively did the Supreme Court of Appeal.
The real goons in the Schabir Shaik matter were the NPA headed by Bulelani
Ngcuka and bossed by Doctor (reason still being research) Penuell Maduna.
If these two goonly stooges in their expensive, but cheap-looking leather
jackets hadn't done a deal made in Alice's Wonderland, then both Thomson-CSF
and Jacob Zuma would have been tried alongside panvis Shaik for the biggest
outcome ever.
I have no doubt whatsoever that the goons' instructions came from Mbeki.
If Mbeki and Zuma were both in jail, then Schabir Shaik would also still be
in jail.
The people who got Schabir Shaik out of jail should also go to jail.