Thabo's boys vs Vula's boys -- the sequel |
Publication | Mail and Guardian |
Date |
2011-12-15 |
Reporter |
Sam Sole |
Web Link |
The rows over Mac Maharaj and Willem Heath are a new
phase in an old war between the acolytes of Thabo Mbeki and the minds behind
Operation Vula.
In November 2001, while working for Noseweek magazine, I wrote a piece
titled "Thabo's boys vs Vula's boys".
The story tried to understand, from available public information, the political
background to the then nascent arms-deal investigation being carried out by the
Scorpions.
One should recall that, at the time, all we really knew was that Tony Yengeni
had been arrested (for lying about his car discount) and Schabir Shaik had been
raided. The fact that Jacob Zuma was a key suspect was then unknown.
It is worth quoting extracts at some length because the trajectory I outlined
(somewhat speculatively) appears to have had some predictive value.
And it may offer some insight into events today, 10 years later, as allegations
about Mac Maharaj, now presidential spokesperson, resurface, as a new Zuma-approved
arms-deal inquiry gets under way, and as former judge Willem Heath clumsily
telegraphs the message that it's open season on Thabo Mbeki and his acolytes.
Noseweek
So here's some of what Noseweek carried in 2001.
"Will President Thabo Mbeki allow the [arms deal] investigation to go the whole
way, risking bringing down the pillars of the temple, or will he seek to limit
the inquiry to small-time corruption involving secondary contracts only? As we
ask it, we know it's a foolish question.
"But let's have a closer look anyway at the situation … and see if our
suspicions are correct.
"Arms-deals investigators will quickly have discovered that those within the ANC
most interested in the deals can be divided roughly into two competing groups:
the Vula boys and Thabo's boys.
"While both are equally anxious to maintain their grip on power and their cut of
the arms-deal profits, the difference between them could just influence who will
be sacrificed and who will be saved in the arms-deal investigations.
"The Vula boys are the collection of communists and [mostly Natal] ANC
intelligence operatives who set up Operation Vula, the secret pre-1990 programme
to develop the leadership and financial networks inside South Africa needed to
launch a violent revolution.
"Vula was controversial because it was secret even inside the ANC -- the wider
ANC leadership, including Thabo Mbeki, knew nothing about it. That gap between
the groups appears to have persisted ...
"Vula was led by Mac Maharaj [later made minister of transport by Mandela, but
fired by Mbeki]. It included Siphiwe Nyanda [now defence force chief], Ronnie
Kasrils [moved by Mbeki from defence to water affairs], Moe Shaik [demoted from
national intelligence coordinator to ambassador in Morocco], and Shaik's brother
Schabir.
"Deputy President Jacob Zuma [then still ANC intelligence chief] was apparently
also within the Vula network and is widely perceived to be the closest the group
has to a protector in government.
"There are clearly ideological issues involved in the conflict. Maharaj, Pravin
Gordhan and company are associated with the ANC's left wing. At least two of the
Shaik brothers have privately expressed concern at the 'crude Africanism'
espoused by some of Mbeki's acolytes ...
"All this might lead one to suspect that the recent raids by the Scorpions on
the offices of Nkobi Holdings and the home of Schabir Shaik might have been
politically motivated. Not so, we are assured ...
"But that's not to say investigators are not under political pressure. They are,
and the focus on the Shaiks has diverted attention from Thabo's boys also having
their snouts deep in the arms-deal trough."
Mbeki's spy
It should be recorded that I had the benefit of one source with insight into
this shadowy world -- the late Bheki Jacobs, a man alternately derided and
feared as "Thabo Mbeki's spy".
It was Jacobs who played a pivotal role in South Africa's post-apartheid history
by blowing the whistle on the arms deal, inter alia through the so-called 1999
"De Lille dossier", which it seems he played the primary role in creating.
Jacobs's thesis was that the anti-Mbeki strand of the ANC, clustered around
Maharaj, had positioned itself to use arms-deal cash to fund their factional
battle.
It is worth recalling this interpretation in the light of information published
by City Press last week. The paper reported that at one point in the
legal tussle between Maharaj and the Scorpions, Maharaj had offered to explain
alleged contradictions between what he told the Scorpions during his June 2003
in-camera interrogation and what it subsequently established about the existence
of and payments into his wife's Geneva bank account.
The explanation, Maharaj reportedly suggested, derived from sensitive internal
ANC activities relating to the struggle against apartheid.
It seems Maharaj subsequently conveyed this explanation to an ANC committee
appointed to investigate the "hoax emails" that attempted to portray the
Scorpions, former national director of public prosecutions Bulelani Ngcuka and
others as part of a conspiracy against Zuma.
Congress tradition
But there appears to be little evidence that Maharaj's hinted explanation
gels with the known facts, unless one argues that Schabir Shaik's contribution
to the financial and political survival of those individuals, such as Maharaj
and Zuma, closely associated with the congress tradition in the ANC, represented
a justifiable continuation of the struggle.
That argument is not wholly without merit, given the strange places Mbeki was
taking the country as he succeeded Mandela, but it is not an easy one to make
legally.
To resume the narrative: it appears that in 1999, when Jacobs tried to alert
Mbeki to the political threat posed by the arms deal, he was rebuffed, not least
because of the ambiguous role played by his contact in the presidency, Essop
Pahad.
Jacobs went on to practise what he called "guerilla intelligence", which the
established spy agencies condemned as information peddling.
It appears he was later reabsorbed into the orbit of the presidency and had an
open channel to the Scorpions. The latter was notably visible in Jacobs's
follow-up "De Lille dossier", released in November 2003, at the height of the
Hefer Commission confrontation between "Mac and Moe" on the one side and Ngcuka
and Mbeki on the other.
The follow-up dossier made the following claim: "Hamaid Baig deposited large
sums of money into Zarina Maharaj's bank account, which was then transferred
into Mac's bond account on his Hyde Park house ... Hamaid Baig is a Pakistani
with United States citizenship."
It is now clear that the information about Baig was almost certainly drawn from
Maharaj's in-camera interview with the Scorpions, which had taken place just
five months earlier.
Opposing forces
The second "De Lille dossier" alleged: "The fight around Bulelani Ngcuka has
become the terrain of battle by both forces, the constitutional, legitimate
forces of the state represented by the president and the unconstitutional,
underground, parallel structures, represented by Mac Maharaj/Jacob Zuma/Moe
Shaik."
The dossier resulted in Jacobs being arrested on the eve of Shaik's testimony at
the Hefer Commission in an operation driven by the Crime Intelligence Service
(CIS), notably Mark Hankel and Ray Lalla, the latter then the acting head of the
CIS.
There is evidence the Scorpions also attempted unofficially to have Maharaj
bugged but that was picked up by a well-connected South African Revenue Service
(Sars) official and reported to Shaik.
Lalla, once part of the Vula machinery, has now rejoined his old comrades at
Sars and the odds are Hankel will survive the current purge of the CIS.
In his Hefer evidence, Shaik made the dramatic claim that other individuals
associated with the Scorpions were about to be arrested.
That didn't happen but he probably had in mind Ivor Powell, whose entrapment by
crime intelligence (on a drunk-driving charge) would happen only in January
2008, after his so-called "Browse Mole" report had been leaked and publicly
discredited.
Where does all this history leave us today? Here are some tentative conclusions:
What is glaring in this whole saga since 1999 is the failure of people such as
Maharaj to eschew a politics of open dissent in favour of a politics of
conspiracy, just like their enemies.
Unless we change, that sort of politics will continue to smother the dream of
1994.
With acknowledgements to Sam Sole and Mail and Guardian.