Without the media, corruption will triumph and blindness will prevail in our society |
Publication |
Sunday Times |
Date | 2011-11-27 |
Reporter | Joe Latakgomo |
Web Link | www.timeslive.co.za |
The ANC, once the victims of apartheid, now
imitate the tactics of their oppressors *1
If anybody asked me today what I thought of democracy in South
Africa, I would borrow Mahatma Gandhi's response to the same question about
Western civilisation and say I think it would be a good idea.
This week, when ANC members of parliament voted to pass the Protection of
State Information Bill, it was done in the name of those millions of people
who voted the party into government.
But surely this is not what the voters wanted? Surely this act cannot be
democratic?
There are those who asked whether the media were not exaggerating the impact
this bill would have on media freedom. Some government ministers even
suggested that the protests over the bill were fuelled and funded by foreign
spies and agents who want to destroy our beautiful country and get access to
"our sensitive information".
It is this same scare-mongering which kept the National Party in power for
decades.
It is significant that some of the people who led the spirited defence of
the bill worked in apartheid government structures like the tricameral
parliament. They obviously learnt well, working with the masters of
oppression and deception. Men of integrity walked out.
The apartheid government told us that we were exaggerating the impact a law
like the Internal Security Act would have, and that it would be used only to
protect the state and the people of the land from terrorists and communist
agitators.
We know better who it was actually aimed at and that it had nothing to do
with the national interest. Many of its victims voted this week for the
passing of the secrecy bill.
The apartheid government told us that the state of emergency regulations and
the deployment of soldiers were in the national interest. We know now, as we
did then, that it was meant to protect an evil system. Thousands of our
brothers and sisters, and fathers and mothers died or disappeared, and the
media were gagged by secrecy provisions in the regulations. Yet the ANC
wants us to believe that the skies will not fall down as a result of the
passing of the bill and that South Africans should relax.
The cancer of corruption is eating away at our
society. It is not the media that say so; it is Transparency
International, which says corruption is getting worse in Southern Africa.
The police service was named as the most corrupt public service provider.
The government has found a public that are dissatisfied with their
conditions. They are unhappy over service delivery. They are angry with the
government over corruption. They see the arrogance of tenderpreneurs
strutting the potholed streets, Johnnie Walker Gold and Blue under their
arms, even as their own children die of hunger
*2 and the frontiers of poverty close in on them.
The media have exposed many crooked tenders which have enriched the ruling
elite.
Whistle-blowers are told they have to report wrongdoing to the police - the
very institution that has been found to be the most corrupt - but they
cannot be in possession of documents that could prove their claims.
It is YOUR money that is being squandered, money that could have improved
your child's educational environment, your health services, your community
services and your infrastructure. And the media will not be able to report
on most of these corrupt activities. That is why the media are concerned.
Even during the dark days of apartheid, it was the media that were able to
expose the humiliation of black prisoners. It was the media that exposed the
government's information scandal, which included the illegal funding of a
newspaper to "give the government's side of the story and report
positively".
In spite of gags, the truth prevailed. It is the media that exposed the
oilgate scandal, the police lease deals and many other corrupt activities
recently. And it is the media that led the
pressure for the government to set up a full probe of the controversial arms
deal. *3
The media generally recognise public consternation about accuracy in
reporting and are engaged in continuing efforts to eliminate errors. The
public still trust the media - which is why whistle-blowers turn to
journalists, rather than the police, to probe wrongdoing. That, at least, is
a good sign.
The public have a right to know what is being done with their resources, and
in their name.
With acknowledgements to Joe Latakgomo and Sunday Times.
*1
*2
People in this relatively wealthy country, especially children, die of
hunger, malaria, dysentry, TB, etc. because money for poverty alleviation,
proper, housing, health care and education (the biggest alleviator of all)
is stolen by the politically elite from the fiscus every day 24/7/365,25.
Probably upwards of 20% of the country's GNP is stolen every year in
corruption.
It starts right at the very, very top and goes down to individual policemen,
and municipal office bearers.
The old NP used to steal quite a bit too, but only about 20% of the tax
revenue and the depth only went down to cabinet ministers and
directors-general.
*3
I thought that that was Terry the Lion Heart, pro bonoed by Paul Hoffman SC,
funded by Bob Glenister and factually supported in the Constitutional Court
by self by means of a 76 page commissioned affidavit with 143 pages of
supporting annexures.
Despite a few exceptions, the 4th Estate has actually done a kak job of the
Arms Deal.
Unlike the Oilgate, Police Lease and Credit Card Licence Deals, where it has
done excellent jobs.
The reason: the Arms Deal outranks the others combined in terms of expose of
the elite and the magnitude of swill by several orders of magnitude.
Without the whistleblowers, corruption will triumph and hunger and sickness
will prevail in our society.
The investigative media wouldn't even have anything to write and get awards
about.