Publication: Business Day Issued: Date: 2010-10-19 Reporter: Editorial

Vigilance wanted after arms cop-out

 

Publication 

Business Day

Date 2010-10-19
Reporter Editorial
Web Link www.bday.co.za

 
The ending of the last investigations into arms deal corruption after 10 long years almost to the week ­ with little to show for it other than severe damage to the credibility of the government and key state institutions ­ represents a failure of our young democracy at the first big hurdle that was put in its way.

After having overcome so much to hold inclusive elections and pave the way for clean and representative governance, we deserved better than this.

Future generations will pay the price for the precedents that have been set as regards political accountability and the independence of institutions such as the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA). History is going to judge us harshly for naively falling into the trap of assuming a democratically elected government could be trusted not to abuse power.

While there are undoubtedly several senior African National Congress (ANC) officials who are breathing a sigh of relief that their concerted effort to kill the probe seems to have paid off, it is a pyrrhic victory. Just as the NPA’s decision to drop the corruption charges faced by President Jacob Zuma , rather than leave it to the courts to decide whether he had a case to answer, has left his name forever tainted, so walking away from the arms deal corruption investigation with so many questions left unanswered means the ANC will never be able to shake off its association with graft.

Now when accusations are levelled against elected officials of the ruling party, or state tenders are awarded to ANC front companies, the assumption is going to be that there is corruption involved. This may not be of much concern to the party while it is still winning elections with ease, but is destined to become a crippling burden in the not-too-distant future when it experiences real competition at the polls.

If the Hawks priority crime investigation unit sees no likelihood of obtaining convictions on the basis of the copious amount of evidence that has been collected over the years, this is because the political will to ensure it finds those convictions does not exist.

It has been clear for some time that much of the Zuma administration’s first term of office has been dedicated to ensuring that the theoretically politically impartial institutions that would make these decisions ­ primarily the NPA and the Hawks’ predecessor, the Scorpions ­ were either compromised or removed.

However, the failure to bring anyone of consequence to book despite
compelling evidence of widespread corruption in the arms deal cannot be blamed solely on domestic skullduggery.

There is an international reluctance to bring the dark dealings of the global arms trade into the open, as illustrated by the British and German governments’ heel-dragging on this and related issues.

The real winners are not the politicians and bureaucrats who took kickbacks, or even the ANC, which is generally assumed to have financed its 1999 election campaign through donations from grateful arms deal contract beneficiaries, but the
shadowy international arms middlemen *1 who are the real corrupters.

While the Democratic Alliance’s call for Parliament’s standing committee on public accounts to conduct a special hearing into the termination of the Hawks’ investigations is unlikely to change things, it is right that both the Hawks and the NPA should at least be forced to explain their actions and justify the decisions they have made. If the NPA insists it has done everything in its power to build a prima facie case but has nevertheless failed, this could open the way for a private prosecution.

SA has lost its innocence, but it is important that it be replaced by healthy scepticism and a vigilant attitude rather than resignation and cynicism.

With acknowledgements to Business Day.



*1       It is not so much the shadowy international arms middlemen (although there are some of them), but the supplier companies themselves, British Aerospace, Thomson-CSF, Thyssen and Ferrostaal. They come up in this instance and they come up almost every time there is a deal somewhere.

Their business models are all the same, bribery and corruption.

They are the permanent face of international deals while the local corrupt government and party officials are the temporary face.

And it's not only armaments companies, Mercedes Benz and Siemens are two recently convicted of bribery on a massive scale.

Sometimes the twain meet, a la DASA/EADS and GFC/Siemens.

British Aerospace and Thomson-CSF try to vertically integrate all of their products in all of their projects and one of these products is corruption.