SA needs answers to arms deal |
Publication |
Sunday Argus |
Reporter | Shireen Mukadam, Ivor Powell |
Date | 2013-05-26 |
Day In Court: Jacob Zuma has not yet
cleared his name.
Full Truth: Schabir Shaik ‘must come
clean about deal’.
Oversight: Thabo Mbeki ‘had overall
control over process’.
Affordability: Trevor Manuel ‘needs to be
subpoenaed’.
Singled Out: Alec Erwin ‘must explain
offsets shortfall’.
President Jacob Zuma's Seriti Commission of
Inquiry into allegations off fraud. corruption,
impropriety or irregularity in the Strategic
Defence Procurement Packages has been in
existence for more than a year and a half. And
so far it has established nothing. Now this
increasingly controversial commission is set to
launch into a cycle of public hearings between
August and the end of November.
To date only a group of whistleblowers on the
scandal and researchers who made submissions to
the commission have had subpoenas served on them
ahead of hearings scheduled for March this year,
but subsequently postponed.
But this week commission spokesman William
Baloyi intimated that a final list of subpoenas
was being drawn up and would be announced at a
later date.
Against the backdrop of its renewed activity,
Shireen Mukadam and Ivor Powell asked some of
the key players who blew the whistle on the
allegations of arms deal corruption just who
should be called to testify before the
Commission in order to uncover the about the R60
billion plus scandal that continues to haunt the
country.
President Jacob Zuma and Schabir Shaik
Patricia de Lille – the politician who put
the arms deal corruption scandal on the
government’s agenda in a sitting of Parliament –
says Zuma should be called on to clarify his
relationship with his former “financial adviser”
Schabir Shaik.
Delivering judgment in May 2005 and sentencing
Shaik to 15 years’ imprisonment for corruption,
Judge Hilary Squires cited overwhelming evidence
of a corrupt relationship enjoyed with
then-deputy president Zuma.
Despite frequently demanding his day in court to
clear his name, Zuma has not to date had to
answer to the charges – this after a subsequent
prosecution initiated by the now-defunct
Directorate of Special Operations was derailed
when then-acting national director of public
prosecutions Mokotedi Mpshe controversially
withdrew charges in 2008, accepting that his
predecessors in the NPA had been guilty of
politically driven interference in the
administration of justice.
Another opportunity to address the issue was
passed up – ironically – by his establishing the
Seriti Commission in the first place.
Required, under a Constitutional Court
application brought by activist Terry
Crawford-Browne, to furnish reasons for not
appointing a judicial commission of inquiry into
the arms deal, Zuma opted at the 11th hour to
announce that a commission would indeed be
instituted.
Pursuing the role played by Zuma, several
whistle-blowers have suggested Shaik should also
be called before the commission.
Mail & Guardian journalist Stefaans Brummer
called for Shaik to be called to give “the full
truth, once and for all, of the Thales bribe for
Jacob Zuma, and of all his other interactions
with JZ”.
Zuma was also identified as a potential witness
by UDM leader Bantu Holomisa, who pointed to
evidence uncovered by a British risk
consultancy, and made public in 2008, alleging
that R30 million was paid to former president
Thabo Mbeki – or a recipient nominated by him –
to guarantee that German shipbuilder Ferrostaal
received the contract for four submarines. Of
this amount, R2m was allegedly paid to Zuma. The
remaining R28m allegedly went to the ANC. In
addition to the issue of the alleged R30m
sweetener paid by Ferrostaal, several
commentators drew attention to the fact that, as
deputy president to Nelson Mandela, Mbeki had a
mandate to exercise ultimate oversight over the
procurement process of the late 1990s.
Thabo Mbeki
Crawford-Browne suggested the former
president should be called to explain “how,
given the apartheid legacies of poverty, an ANC
government could prioritise the purchase of
weapons before poverty eradication?”
Crawford-Browne is seeking to have the
procurement process repudiated on the basis of
corruption and failures to match up to
constitutional responsibilities. This is backed
up by a legal opinion prepared by human rights
advocate Geoff Budlender.
Defence contractor Richard Young’s questions are
more detailed. He suggested two senior naval
officers – Vice Admiral Robert Simpson-Anderson
and Rear Admiral Jonny Kamerman – be called to
reveal whether they were “called in front of
president Thabo Mbeki to take instructions
regarding the execution of the corvette
project”.
Young also suggested the commission interrogate
a series of interactions between the naval top
brass and executives from German shipbuilder
Blom+Voss, French contractor Detexis (which was
awarded the contract originally slotted for
Young’s company C2I2), Thomson-CSF (now Thales),
among others.
After winning a disclosure of information case
brought against the office of the
auditor-general, Young is legally in possession
of very substantial documentation collected by
the first major investigation into the arms deal
scandal, conducted in the early 2000s by the now
defunct Directorate of Special Operations, the
office of the auditor-general and Judge Willem
Heath’s Special Investigating Unit. Young was
able to demonstrate, on the basis of the
documentation, substantial interference by the
executive in the final report of the joint
investigation.
Trevor Manuel
Several respondents said former finance
minister Trevor Manuel should be issued with a
subpoena. Among the key questions raised – by
Holomisa and researcher Paul Holden, the author
of The Arms Deal in your Pocket, and co-author
of the compendious Devil in the Detail – was why
Manuel chose to override a specially
commissioned affordability report on the
then-prospective arms deal – “a scathing
report”, according to Holden – which “indicated
that the economic impact of the deal was to be
broadly negative and the materialisation of
offsets uncertain”.
Alec Erwin
Former minister of trade and industry Alec
Erwin was singled out by Holden as another of
the four members of the ministerial subcommittee
responsible for overseeing the arms deal. As
minister in charge of and a major proponent of
the arms deal offset programme, he said Erwin
should be called to account for the fact that
measurable economic benefits realised from
contractor investments into the South African
economy fell some R100 billion short of the
mooted R110bn.
Erwin should also be asked to explain why he
“insisted on the commercial confidentiality of
information surrounding offsets, despite it
being of manifest public importance”.
The ANC
In correspondence with the Seriti
Commission, the role played by the ANC as a
party in the scandal is highlighted. In this
vein, Crawford-Browne raised the thorny issue of
ANC funding, suggesting that former
treasurer-general Mendi Msimang, as well as his
successor, Zweli Mkhize, and secretary-general
Gwede Mantashe, were responsible to account for
where the ANC gets its money. “I would want to
know how the ANC suddenly went from insolvent to
worth R1.75bn at the time of the 2007 Polokwane
conference” Crawford-Browne said.
Numsa
The alleged funding of political entities
was also highlighted by De Lille in calling for
scrutiny of a transaction uncovered by Swedish
investigators regarding a “donation” of tens of
millions of rand paid by British Aerospace and
its partner Saab to the officials from the
National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa,
supposedly for a training college to be built in
South Africa.
Middlemen
In investigations by the UK’s serious fraud
office, as well as German probes, several
multimillion-rand “consultants” to the various
bidding companies were identified as allegedly
having benefited significantly from the arms
deal, among them the enigmatic Tony Georgiades,
former Armscor executive Llew Swann and Fana
Hlongwane. Among other respondents researched,
Hennie Van Vuuren suggested such figures would
be in a position to assist the commission in its
search for the truth.
Chippy Shaik
Holden describes former military adviser
Shamim “Chippy” Shaik, brother to Schabir, as
having been “absolutely central to the arms deal
procurement process”, and as having played a
role “at all levels in the decision-making
hierarchy”, and as having been instrumental in
“making decisions that made a material
difference in the selection of winning bidders”.
All those canvassed by Weekend Argus called for
Chippy Shaik to be called to testify.
Young mentioned a $3m (R28.59m) payment
allegedly made to Shaik by Christophe Hoenings
of German contractor Thyssen.
Holden was equally specific, citing former US
ambassador George Traill in alleging that Shaik
was directly involved in the solicitation of
bribes. The spotlight was also shone on a
company with personal links to the Shaik
brothers, as well as family connections with
former defence minister Joe Modise.
Futuristic Business Solutions
FBS, a company with no history in the field
of logistics, emerged as the recipient of 70
subcontracts worth R750m, according to Holden.
With acknowledgement to Shireen Mukadam, Ivor Powell and Sunday Argus.
Corvette Leg Only
Chippy
Shaik
Why did you
take the USD3 million bribe from Christophe
Hoenings of Thyssen on behalf of you and you
representing a group of others?
Who are the others in the group represent by
you?
Did a meeting to discuss the corvette combat
suite contracting model take place on 19 August
1999?
Was this Special Naval PCB?
Was this a properly constituted PCB?
Did you attend this meeting?
Who else attended this meeting?
What was decided at this meeting?
Where are the minutes or confirmatory notes of
this meeting?
Tony Yengeni
Why did you take the DM2,5 million bribe
from Christophe Hoenings of Thyssen?
Vice Admiral Robert Simpson-Anderson
Did you receive a bribe from Christophe
Hoenings of Thyssen?
Did you receive the bribe payment through former
chief of the SA Nay Vice Admiral Dries Putter?
Why did you meet Christophe Hoenings of Thyssen
and Herbert von Nitzsch of Blohm+Voss in Tony
Georgiadis's permanent suite at the Sandton Sun
Hotel in Johannesburg on 24 January 1996?
Who arranged this meeting?
Did Capt(SAN) Jonny Kamerman also attend this
meeting?
Who else attended this meeting?
Why did you invite Tony Georgadis to your home
in circa October 1995?
Why did you want to meet with the company
Detexis in France in June 1999?
Was this regular with you being alone?
Was this regular without the presence of both
Armscor and the German Frigate Consortium?
Why did you want to have an informal meeting on
28 June in Paris with one or several
representatives from the top management of the
Thomson-CSF group?
Was this regular you being alone?
Was this regular without the presence of both
Armscor and the German Frigate Consortium?
Did you and Rear Admiral Jonny Kamerman get
called in front of President Thabo Mbeki to take
instructions regarding the execution of the
corvette project?
Did a meeting to discuss the corvette combat
suite contracting model take place on 19 August
1999?
Was this Special Naval PCB?
Was this a properly constituted PCB?
Did you attend this meeting?
Who else attended this meeting?
What was decided at this meeting?
Where are the minutes or confirmatory notes of
this meeting?
[Note : from the JIT Report :
"11.6.8.2 This special meeting, if it took place, was one of the most crucial meetings of the PCB."]
Jonny
Kamerman
Who tried to bribe you?
Did you and Vice Admiral Robert Simpson-Anderson
get called in front of President Thabo Mbeki to
take instructions regarding the execution of the
corvette project?
What exactly was the acquisition mechanism for
the Exocet MM40 surface-to-surface missiles (SSMs)?
Was the full and normal price for all 17 SSMs
actually paid or was there some kind of lease or
hire purchase scheme?
Are you a member of the group represented by
Chippy Shaik who solicited a bribe from
Christophe Hoenings of Thyssen?
Who are the members of the group represented by
Chippy Shaik who solicited a bribe from
Christophe Hoenings of Thyssen?
Did you receive instructions to increase the
French component of the corvette combat suite?
From whom did you receive instructions to
increase the French component of the corvette
combat suite?
Why precisely did you meet with Duncan Hiles and
Kevin O'Neill of ADS on circa 16 December 1998
regarding the corvette combat suite
architecture?
Did a meeting to discuss the corvette combat
suite contracting model take place on 19 August
1999?
Was this Special Naval PCB?
Was this a properly constituted PCB?
Did you attend this meeting?
Who else attended this meeting?
What was decided at this meeting?
Where are the minutes or confirmatory notes of
this meeting?
[Note : from the JIT Report :
"11.6.8.2 This special meeting, if it took place, was one of the most crucial meetings of the PCB."]
Thabo Mbeki
Why were you meeting with senior executives
from Thomson-CSF in Paris in December 1998 and
later in South Africa in 1999?
Why did you guarantee Thomson-CSF the contract
for the combat suite and its sensors long before
the contract negotiations had even commenced?
Pierre Moynot or Alain Thetard
Why did Thomson-CSF need to bribe Jacob Zuma
R500 000 per year until ADS started paying
dividends in order to protect it from the
investigation into Project Sitron?
If you can get proper answers to these questions
you will have solved the corvette leg of the
Arms Deal.
But if you don't like my questions I have two
thousand others.
And if you don't like my witnesses I have two
hundred others.