Seriti must ‘ reply to attack or resign' |
Publication |
Sunday Times |
Date | 2013-01-20 |
Reporter |
Werner Swart, Sabelo Skiti |
Web Link | thetimes.newspaperdirect.com |
The spotlight is on Judge Willie Seriti
following the resignation of senior arms deal
commission investigator Norman Moabi. In his
resignation letter, Moabi cited an alleged
hidden agenda at the Arms Procurement Commission
headed by Judge Seriti.
The commission, appointed by President Jacob
Zuma to investigate the decade-old arms deal
saga, is scheduled to start public hearings in
March.
Paul Hoffman, director of the Institute for
Accountability in Southern Africa, said: “Seriti
himself must deal with each and every allegation
contained in that letter, otherwise his
credibility is shot to pieces. Unless he is able
to show that Moabi is talking through his hat …
or has an ulterior motive, I think his goose is
cooked. One doesn’t want to jump to conclusions;
[Seriti] must be given an opportunity to clear
his name. This [Moabi’s resignation] is not an
attack on the commission, it is an attack on
Seriti.
“Nobody said the commission or the secretariat
has done anything wrong and there is no
complaint about anyone else. It is up to Seriti
himself to rebut what has been put out. I’ve
said he must explain, resign, or face the
consequences,” Hoffman said.
Moabi’s resignation letter surfaced this week
and triggered rumours that more may follow.
In the letter he said: “I am unable to be part
of this commission since I have satisfied myself
that the chairperson seems to have other ideas
and modus operandi to achieve with the
commission what is not the clear mandate of the
enabling Government Gazette.” He also raised
concerns that:
The direction in which the commission was headed
would not achieve its original mandate;
Judge Seriti had a “total obsession with the
control of the flow of information”;
“Unknown person(s)” dictated processes at the
commission; and
“Unknown persons” decided which evidence leaders
would deal with specific witnesses.
Moabi wrote under the headline “The penny has
dropped” that he was concerned by comments made
by people at the commission, such as
“When we will have
dealt with the first witnesses, they will not
again make noises in the media”.
Judge Seriti and commission spokesman William
Baloyi declined to comment.
With acknowledgement to Werner Swart, Sabelo Skiti and Sunday Times.
I think his goose is
cooked.
It is impossible for a witness to confidently
and comfortably giving their testimony knowing
that there is a fink in the chair and that there
is the real threat of credibility destruction to
the degree that they will never talk to the
public media again.
It's a very real and nasty threat and one to be
taken really seriously.
Unless the leopard changes its spots, which in
this case will be a tough call.
But would work beautifully.
I also think that the use of the specific term
"public media" is not random - there is always
the private media.
Watch one's back and what one says on the phone.
Walk softly and carry a big stick.
And a .38 Special.