Banks bent over backwards for Zuma |
Publication |
Mail & Guardian |
Date | 2012-12-07 |
Reporter |
Craig McKune |
Web link | www.mg.co.za |
After 1994, South Africa's biggest banks bent
over backwards to accommodate Jacob Zuma, who
regularly splurged on credit.
He splurged with little regard for his
inability to pay off his deepening debt.
This is according to evidence collated by audit
firm KPMG and presented in its 2006 forensic
report.
Zuma was elected as ANC national chairperson in
1994 and ANC deputy president in 1997. He was
South Africa's deputy president between 1999 and
June 2005. During this period, he spent far in
excess of his salary, buying properties and cars
on credit, repeatedly exceeding his bank
overdrafts' limits and defaulting on his debts.
Contrary to sound practice, the banks often
tolerated his actions. At least in the case of
Absa, this was explicitly – though internally –
justified on the basis that Zuma was
"politically" and "strategically" valuable.
On numerous occasions Zuma, often through
Schabir Shaik as his "financial adviser",
promised the banks that his various benefactors
would repay his debts, and in some instances
they did. But inevitably Standard Bank, Absa
and Nedbank, among others,
got their fingers
burnt.
Zuma's banking troubles first peaked after
Standard Bank bonded a property of his in 1995.
The bank had extended the bond despite Zuma
having defaulted on a bond with a different bank
months before.
By 1997, the Standard Bank bond was in arrears
and Zuma's overdraft on a cheque account there
exceeded R100 000. The bank put its foot down,
cancelling his credit card and obtaining a court
order against him, but it abandoned this order
in 1998.
Disappointment
In 2002 Standard Bank appears to have
dropped its pursuit of the R128 300 overdraft
and in 2005 it wrote off Zuma's bond account –
just less than R200 000 – as bad debt.
This did not stop FNB from granting Zuma a R900
000 bond for Nkandla after a senior bank
official wrote: "I am sure that the powers that
be will assist us where
we need to bend the
rules a little." Zuma benefactor Vivian
Reddy had to stand security, though.
From 1996 to 2004, Zuma also built up a R214 000
overdraft at Nedbank, which
politely
noted its "disappointment" at Zuma's lack of
response to their queries.
But Zuma's
relationship with Absa was most telling.
When Zuma opened his account in 1998, Absa
business centre manager Raymond O'Neil attempted
to justify the decision despite Zuma's bad
credit record with Standard Bank and Nedbank,
which he specifically noted. O'Neil wrote in a
memorandum that Zuma was likely to be elected
South Africa's deputy president the following
year and Nelson
Mandela was going to settle his debts.
Apparently quoting Zuma, O'Neil said that Zuma's
"bank balance was the last item on his mind,
with more important matters regarding the
country and the province to focus on".
According to O'Neil: "We recommend the opening
of [the] Unique package account for Minister
Zuma, based on his strategic positioning and
importance to the group." Within three months
Zuma's account was in overdraft and he had, once
again, exceeded his overdraft limits.
As Absa's patience wore thin in 2000 and bankers
noted in records that Zuma's conduct was
"unacceptable", there was indeed a R2-million
cheque received from Mandela, but apart from
R100 000 that stayed in his account, the rest
immediately flowed out.
Although Zuma's financial position tended to be
cash-starved at the time, in 2001 Absa signed
him on as a Absa Private Bank client, which is
usually reserved for those with more than
R1-million to invest in markets.
Once again this was noted to be
a political decision,
seemingly in line with chief executive Nallie
Bosman's view, stated in bank records, that "in
terms of all financial matters" Zuma was
considered "a
strategic client".
But soon after this Zuma was hugely overdrawn,
much to some bankers' chagrin. According to a
note by one of them: "The
conduct leaves much
to be desired, but we have little option
but to live with
this client in view of his position."
With acknowledgement to Craig McKune and Mail & Guardian.
The bank's were
actually very clever.
For a relatively small risk and loss a decade
ago, they now have a R500 million client.
Their R500 million client has a few billion
Rands in relatives and well paying stooges.
It was an excellent investment with utmost
foresight.