Simelane not stripped of Bar membership |
Publication |
Business Day |
Date | 2011-12-05 |
Reporter |
Franny Rabkin |
Web Link | www.bday.co.za |
Menzi Simelane
Picture: Financial Mail
FORMER national director of public
prosecutions Menzi Simelane is still a
member of the Johannesburg Bar and has not
been stripped of his membership not yet,
at least.
Modise Khoza SC, chairman of the
Johannesburg Bar Council, was on Wednesday
quick to correct a newspaper report earlier
in the day that the Bar had met on Tuesday
night to discuss the finalisation of charges
against Mr Simelane.
He confirmed that there had been a meeting
of the council on Tuesday night, but said Mr
Simelane had not been on the agenda and was
not discussed nor was he stripped of his
membership.
Mr Simelane had also not resigned, "to the
best of my knowledge", said Mr Khoza.
However, the disciplinary process to
determine whether the former prosecutions
chief is fit and proper to be an advocate is
continuing.
Mr Khoza said no formal charges had yet been
brought against Mr Simelane, but once they
were, a panel would be appointed to hear the
matter.
Mr Simelane’s appointment as national
director was set aside as invalid by the
Constitutional Court in October. The
judgment said the appointment was irrational
because President Jacob Zuma had failed to
consider on-the-face-of-it indications of
dishonesty in Mr Simelane’s conduct at
former speaker of Parliament Frene Ginwala’s
inquiry into the fitness for office of Mr
Simelane’s predecessor, Vusi Pikoli.
At the time, Mr Simelane was
director-general of the Department of
Justice and Constitutional Development and
gave evidence at the inquiry. But Ms Ginwala
said his conduct at the inquiry "left much
to be desired".
The Constitutional Court found that Mr
Simelane’s evidence was contradictory and,
on the face of it, indicative of dishonesty.
As Mr Zuma had ignored "flashing red
lights", it made the appointment irrational.
With acknowledgement to
Franny Rabkin
and Business Day.
Another NPA polecat home to roost.
But spare a thought.
He didn't lie under oath for himself.
He did it under instruction to protect his
principal's ass.
But at the same time he was the cause of my
German Leg investigation being abandoned by
the NPA.
So he'll get struck from the bar for
perjury.
Being of no such professional elevation, his
principal will have to be struck with a bar.
Or hounded back to a R5 billion country
estate.
Who is ready, willing and able to effect
this hounding?
Stand up.