Nkandla: Reddy an unapologetic benefactor |
Publication |
Mail & Guardian |
Date | 2012-11-23 |
Reporter |
AmaBhungane Reporters |
Web link | www.mg.co.za |
Vivian Reddy says he has always regarded it as
his duty to help struggle veterans (David
Harrison, M&G)
Without Vivian Reddy's provision of surety, FNB
would not have granted a loan for President
Jacob Zuma's Nkandla property.
Vivian Reddy, the Durban tycoon who helped to
fund the first phase of President Jacob Zuma's
sprawling Nkandla homestead, prides himself on
bankrolling ANC struggle veterans.
Evidence was led at the corruption trial of
Zuma's former financial adviser, Schabir Shaik,
that after Shaik balked at the escalating cost
of
the Nkandla development, Reddy stepped in to
help
Zuma to secure a home loan from First National
Bank (FNB).
The judge in the Shaik trial, Hilary Squires,
also found that a R250 000 payment by French
arms-deal bidder Thomson CSF*1 (formerly called
Thales) to Zuma had passed through the bank
account of Reddy's Development Africa Trust en
route to funding the Nkandla project.
In a February 2012 profile in the Witness
newspaper, Reddy is quoted as saying: "It's no
secret that I have helped lots of struggle
veterans because it is in my nature to help
people. I have been in business since apartheid,
while these brave people sacrificed their jobs,
lives and families to give the nation human
rights and dignity. This is my way of
contributing to the liberation struggle. The
sacrifices made by these activists for a free
and
democratic South Africa are deserving of my
generosity. Where would we be without their
selfless contribution*2?
"I have helped lots of them and, like Zuma, they
pay me back. I put formal loan agreements in
place."
The KwaZulu-Natal-born electricity magnate
started to build his Edison Power Group more
than
30 years ago with just R500 in his pocket and a
borrowed bakkie.
His family-owned empire has expanded from a
one-man electrician's shop to a wide portfolio
of
interests in energy, casinos, healthcare,
financial services and property development.
Insurance assessments
Much of his wealth comes from major
KwaZulu-Natal
government contracts, including one related to
the R7-billion Dube Trade Port, as well as
lucrative black economic empowerment deals.
He has publicly donated money to the Jacob Zuma
Foundation and gave financial support to Zuma
before the ANC's 2007 Polokwane conference,
although he claimed that the latter had paid him
back "every cent" in terms of a formal
agreement.
In 2002, Reddy helped Zuma to secure a R900 000
home loan from FNB on his Nkandla residence.
Zuma first applied for a loan in 2001, when his
homestead was worth between R650 000 and R750
000, according to a bank valuation and insurance
assessments.
By December 2002, FNB had granted him a loan,
despite the fact that he was in dire financial
straits, did not have a formal lease on the land
and the bank's policy was not to bond property
in tribal trusts.
The existence of the loan and some of the
details
surrounding it were confirmed in the original
indictment against Shaik. The loan was granted,
the court was told, only because of a R400 000
surety signed by Reddy, who then made the
monthly
R12 000 bond repayments until at least March
2004.
The indictment noted: "Without [Reddy's] surety,
the application would not have been approved due
to the financial profile of Zuma and the fact
that the property in question forms part of
tribal land."
Repaid
Last weekend, Reddy confirmed that he had lent
Zuma money for the first phase of construction,
adding that the loan had since been repaid.
In his judgment in the Shaik trial, Squires
referred to evidence that Reddy had stepped in
to
help a cash-strapped Zuma with payments for
Nkandla when Shaik reportedly grew frustrated
with his profligate spending.
Zuma contracted builder Eric Malengret to build
the homestead at a cost of R2.4-million, later
reduced to R1.3-million, without consulting
Shaik, although he had no way of paying for the
construction.
Reddy also allegedly lent Malengret R50 000
after Zuma failed to pay him.
At least part of the payment for Nkandla,
according to prosecutors in Shaik's trial, was
linked with the notorious "encrypted fax" drawn
up by an executive of French defence company
Thomson CSF, Alain Thetard.
The fax reflected Thetard's report of his
meeting
with Shaik and Zuma in Durban in March 2000, the
month Zuma commissioned architects to design his
homestead.
According to the fax, Shaik indicated to Thetard
that Zuma was requesting R500 000 a year in
return for his protection in the looming
investigation of the arms deal*3 and his support
for future Thomson projects.
Zuma denied*4 the meeting to Parliament, whereas
Shaik said during his trial the meeting did
happen, but was about a Thomson donation to the
Jacob Zuma Education Trust, an explanation
rejected by the judge.
Instead, Squires found that a first payment of
R250 000 in terms of the bribe agreement found
its way into Reddy's bank account: "It is clear
that one payment was made which went via
[Shaik's
company] to Development Africa, which was Reddy,
and Reddy eventually achieved payment of a large
part of the costs of the Nkandla project."
Our Coverage
<http://mg.co.za/article/2012-11-23-00-nkandla-documents-call-zumas-bluff>Nkandla:
Documents call Zuma's bluff
<http://mg.co.za/article/2012-11-21-anc-media-deliberately-misleading-on-nkandla-reports>ANC:
Media 'deliberately misleading' on Nkandla reports
<http://mg.co.za/article/2012-11-20-fnb-we-couldnt-have-given-zuma-a-bond-for-nkandla>FNB:
We couldn't have given Zuma a bond for Nkandla
<http://mg.co.za/article/2012-11-20-nkandla-zuma-does-have-a-bond-for-r900-000>Nkandla:
Zuma does have a bond - for R900 000
Read more…
<http://www.mg.co.za/article/2012-11-23-00-nkandla-whats-in-the-name-of-a-country-estate>What's
in the name of a country estate?
<http://www.mg.co.za/article/2012-11-23-00-nkandla-profligate-and-presidential>Profligate
and presidential
<http://www.mg.co.za/article/2012-11-23-00-nkandla-documents-call-zumas-bluff>Documents
call Zuma's bluff
With acknowledgement to
AmaBhungane Reporters and Mail & Guardian.
*1 Another criminal that the NPA let free.
When it was there for the plucking.
And roasting.
And wiping off the face of this planet.
*2 Selfless contribution indeed.
*3 Never once has anybody, except me, tried
to question, let along investigate, why
Thomson-CSF needed this protection.
It is because Thomson-CSF paid bribes of around
R300 000 in order to win a R1,3 billion combat
suite contract firstly without any competition,
secondly on its own terms and thirdly at a price
of over R1,2 billion about its
cabinet-stipulated
R1,4 ceiling price (R2,6 - R1,4).
*4 Lying to Parliament is petty crime in
comparison to slithering out of the prime evil
slime to become Prince of Nkandla.
But he's in good company with Thabo and the rest
of the usual suspects.
Although an old and simple story, I had great\
difficulty this morning keeping my breakfast
down
while reading and commenting on it.
Barrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrfffffff..