M&G broke the law: Maharaj |
Publication |
News24 |
Date | 2012-08-03 |
Reporter | Sapa |
Web Link | www.news24.com |
Cape Town - Presidential spokesperson
Mac Maharaj insisted on Friday that the Mail
& Guardian broke the law by running an article
on his testimony in an arms deal probe.
It did so by trying to publish records of an
inquiry into allegations that he received
kickbacks from French arms manufacturer Thales,
he said.
"The M&G is in violation of the National
Prosecuting Authority Act."
This was why he decided to proceed with charges
against the newspaper and two of its
investigative reporters, Maharaj wrote in an
opinion piece published by the M&G.
He contended that the newspaper transgressed
Section 41(6) of the act in disclosing
information gathered in the course of a
confidential inquiry.
The newspaper could only have received the
records unlawfully "in that they were stolen
from where they were kept before they were
handed to the M&G".
Maharaj said he was therefore not surprised that
the newspaper was "so strident in condemning the
criminal charges levelled against it as 'an
attack on the press'".
"If no crime has been committed, why does it not
let the matter take its course and let the
courts decide?"
The charges relate to an article the paper ran
in November last year with most of the wording,
and sections of an accompanying editorial,
blacked out.
The newspaper said it censored itself under
threat of legal action from Maharaj.
Editor
Nic Dawes said if printed in full, the story
would have shown that Maharaj lied when
questioned under oath by the now defunct
Scorpions.
Last week, Dawes and reporters Sam Sole and
Stefaans Brummer were questioned by the NPA's
specialised commercial crimes unit in Pretoria.
Dawes said they were called to so-called
"warning" interviews, during which they were
informed of the charges against them and of
their rights.
Maharaj has denied ever being involved in
corruption and bribery.
He said Dawes' claim that his charges amount to
an attack on press freedom, "conveniently"
ignored the purpose served by section 41(6) of
the NPA Act.
"The act serves a very specific purpose and in
doing so seeks to counterbalance the intrusive
measures contained in it by stipulating that
these inquiries be confidential."