Uncertain future for Armscor |
Publication |
defenceWeb |
Date | 2013-03-01 |
Reporter | Kim Helfrich |
Web link | www.defenceweb.co.za |
State armaments corporation Armscor may cease to
exist if a proposal in Roelf Meyer’s draft
Defence Review goes ahead, while the head of
Armscor has said the organisation is a mere
shadow of its former self, prompting a
controversial re-examining of the organisation.
In its last annual report Armscor indicates it
has not had a smooth passage in recent times.
Board chairman Lieutenant General (ret) Maomela
Moreti Motau notes in the report that, “The once
glorious Armscor, that driver of technological
advancement in the South African economy, that
bastion of innovation, that flagship of
strategic capabilities of the SA National
Defence Force, is a mere shadow of its former
self”.
He added that Armscor had become “a mere
spectator” in the decision-making process on
arms acquisition.
Looking at the way forward Motau said the new
board embarked on an introspection exercise to
determine whether it would preside over the
continuing decline of the corporation, or take
it to a higher plane to reclaim its legislated
position (in terms of the Armaments Corporation
of South Africa Limited Act, Act 53 of 2003).
This led to Armscor defining a new strategy for
itself, parts of which it has been made
available to defenceWeb.
“The strategic re-positioning of Armscor is not
a deviation from the Act or a new creation. It
is a reaffirmation of that for which the Act
makes provision. All elements contained in the
repositioning strategy and the direction the
Board is taking is not in any way a
contravention of the Act.
“The strategy focuses on strengthening Armscor,
to ensure it is able to meet and support the
client’s (SANDF) current and future requirements
and provide the same services to other organs of
state and other
governments.
“In terms of the Act, Armscor is bound to
maintain strategic and essential capabilities,
resources and technologies. This is to ensure
research and development is strengthened in the
country and beyond. The maintenance and
development of strategic capabilities will not
be realised without a vibrant and sustainable
private and public sector.
“The strategy seeks to strengthen the defence
industry both in the public and private sector
as the defence industry is an enabler for
Armscor to execute its mandate. Another area the
strategy seeks to achieve is sustainability of
the capability in Armscor and in the defence
industry. To this end, just like the rest of the
world, the defence industry diversifies military
technology and products for commercial use.
“The strategy thus seeks to encourage and
support commercialisation of military technology
to ensure sustainability of the required
capabilities in the defence industry and Armscor,”
read the Armscor statement, released exclusively
to defenceWeb.
defenceWeb has also had sight of a document
entitled “Repositioning Armscor: Strategy
through the 21st Century”. No authorship is
attributed to the document, approved in July
2011, which carries the official Armscor logo.
Chapters cover the establishment of different
defence and industrial manufacturing sectors and
list possible partner countries for missiles and
targeting systems; sensors and imaging systems;
aerospace systems and land systems as well as
strategic projects including trucks, utility
helicopters, shipbuilding, and missile and
tractor systems.
Some of these would seem to
indicate Armscor
plans to return to the manufacturing arena
with products
destined for the commercial market as
well as for use by the SANDF.
It has been speculated that the Repositioning
Armscor document has caused some controversy in
the defence sector, with Armscor senior
management dismissing it as “a document that
shows an abysmal lack of understanding of the
business in general and the technicalities in
particular”.
The strategy is at odds with the proposal to
establish a Defence Material Organization in the
Defence Review and do away with Armscor. The
21st century strategy is also apparently not
supported by the defence department and may have
been one of the reasons why former defence
minister Lindiwe Sisulu attempted to dismiss
Motau in June last year.
The draft Defence Review will be tabled in
Parliament before the financial year end. Both
Armscor and AMD (the South African Aerospace,
Maritime and Defence Industries Association)
indicated there would be no public discussion
around the 500 plus page document before its
approval by Cabinet and subsequent release for
public comment.
With acknowledgement to Kim Helfrich and defenceWeb.
Very senior Armscor
management got dismissed late last year for
describing the new draft strategy as “a document
that shows an abysmal lack of understanding of
the business in general and the technicalities
in particular”.
After 27 years at Armscor, Pierre Meiring nows
languishes unemployed at home at the age of 55
for articulating his view.
Armscor's proposed new strategy is certainly a
repositioning.
Positioning to put a certain few and their
friends right at the front of the queue for
contracts.