Exercising options |
Publication |
Financial Mail |
Date | 2012-08-01 |
Reporter | Lindo Xulu |
Web Link | www.fm.co.za |
With barely a few hours left before the
Tuesday midnight deadline for submissions to be
delivered to the arms deal commission, only
seven had been received. They included
submissions from retired banker Terry
Crawford-Browne, Cape Town mayor Patricia de
Lille and arms deal author Paul Holden.
In a twist of events, defence contractor Richard
Young - the man whose affidavit formed part of
Crawford-Browne's successful constitutional bid,
which forced President Jacob Zuma to establish a
commission of inquiry into the deal - has at the
eleventh hour opted to rather be subpoenaed than
forward a submission.
"After careful consideration I've decided not to
make any submissions.
There are a number
of issues I have with the [Judge Willie]
Seriti commission. The terms of reference do not
necessarily provide for the release of a final
report, which means I could spend six months
giving evidence, naming parties, and it could
never come out," he says.
Young is also concerned that Zuma himself will
decide whether or not the report is made public.
"And no protection or legal support is offered
to people giving evidence.
"If they want me, it'll have to be on my own
terms."
While Crawford-Browne shares Young's
scepticism,
he's decided to make his submission, with one
caveat.
"I'd like my submission to be made public, so
I've written to the commission requesting to
have my wish certified," says Crawford-Brown.
Last month the FM (Features June 8) reported
that under the regulations which govern the
commission any document submitted or destined to
be submitted could not be made public without
the written permission of Seriti, and that the
failure to adhere to this regulation would
result in a fine or imprisonment for up to six
months.
As the commission moves on with its work, its
relationship with Zuma has come under some
scrutiny. Earlier this month he met senior
members of the commission, including Seriti.
Commission spokesman William Baloyi refused to
provide details on the contents of the meeting,
saying it formed part of the commission's first
"six-monthly reports".
At the announcement of the commission's terms of
reference in October last year, justice &
constitutional development minister Jeff Radebe
said the commission would submit "interim
reports and recommendations to the president
from time to time and at least every six months
prior to the finalisation of its report".
However, because of allegations that Zuma is
linked to the arms deal and has committed to
testifying before the commission, De Lille,
among others, has questioned the private nature
of the commission's meetings with the president,
raising questions about the commission's
credibility.
"There's definitely a conflict of interest. In
my view a judicial commission of inquiry should
not only be independent but also be seen to be
independent. Given the president's involvement
in the whole arms deal saga his interaction with
the commission needs to be assessed," says De
Lille.
University of Cape Town law professor Pierre de
Vos says: "Legally, given that it's the
president who appointed the commission, it would
be difficult for people to find fault with him
meeting its members. It's more an issue of
credibility. If I were the president I would
give an undertaking that I would not insist on
seeing a draft report, and that once finalised
the report would be made public. In that way he
would be insulated from suspicion."
Seriti and a team of investigators visited
England and Germany in June in connection with
the inquiry. Though the commission refused to
provide additional information, letters seeking
mutual legal assistance from a number of other
countries have apparently been requested.
While the deadline for submissions has closed
and according to Baloyi was not to be
"extended", the chairman retains the discretion
to accept late submissions. Following the
submission deadline, the commission says, Baloyi
will be "studying the submissions and other
documentation received from various people and
institutions and will be conducting further
investigations to gather more information".
The process will be private, but a public
hearing will more than likely begin early next
year.
At the time of writing the presidency had not
replied to our repeated requests for comment.
With acknowledgement to Lindo Xulu and Financial Mail.
What is the name of
the process where alot of effort is applied, but
the proceeds thereof spllled upon the ground?
The Zuma/Maharaj fishing commission?