Zuma’s questionable relationship with the NPA |
Publication |
Business Day |
Date | 2013-01-04 |
Reporter |
Stephen Grootes |
Web Link | www.bday.co.za |
Nomgcobo Jiba, acting national director
of public prosecutions
Picture: Sowetan
Concern has been expressed in several
quarters particularly in opposition
parties and the legal fraternity about the
effect of President Jacob Zuma’s presidency
on the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA).
Mr Zuma’s path to power included what many
viewed as manipulation of the NPA to ensure
it dropped corruption charges against him.
But an examination of the history of the NPA
shows its independence may have been doomed
from its formation.
The NPA was formed in 1998, after express
provision was made for it in the
constitution.
The constitution clearly provides for
independent prosecutorial decision making
and says the head of the authority, the
national director of public prosecutions (NDPP),
is appointed by the president, with just two
conditions: that he be qualified to "appear
in all courts in SA" and he be a "fit and
proper person".
It was this second criterion that saw the
Democratic Alliance win a court battle with
the Presidency over Mr Zuma’s appointment of
the most recent NPA head, Menzi Simelane.
The Constitutional Court found that Mr Zuma
had acted irrationally in appointing Mr
Simelane, because he had ignored serious
question marks over Mr Simelane’s honesty
and integrity.
Former president Thabo Mbeki appointed the
first NDPP, advocate Bulelani Ngcuka, and it
fell to Mr Ngcuka just a few years after
the NPA was created and was still finding
its feet to make decisions about
prosecuting then deputy president Jacob Zuma.
But, as the infamous "Zuma spy tapes"
purport to reveal, Mr Ngcuka did not always
seem make these decisions without "fear or
favour". Discussions on those decisions go
back to December 2007 and suggest a
political motive in the timing of the
decision to charge Mr Zuma with corruption.
However, by then the damage had long been
done to the NPA, and largely by Mr Ngcuka
himself.
It was he who, in August 2003, said the NPA
(ie himself) had decided not to prosecute Mr
Zuma despite "there being prima facie
evidence against him".
This was followed by a meeting of newspaper
editors (famously dubbed the "blacks only
editors meeting") where he claimed Mr Zuma
was "not fit to govern".
It would appear that much of this behaviour
may have been at the behest of Mr Mbeki, the
man who had appointed him.
Eventually, Mr Zuma’s allies responded with
a claim that Mr Ngcuka had been an apartheid
spy.
Despite being cleared by the Hefer
commission, Mr Ngcuka resigned and was
replaced by advocate Vusi Pikoli.
Mr Pikoli was a different kettle of fish.
While going ahead with the Zuma prosecution,
he also decided to charge then national
police commissioner Jackie Selebi, who was
implicated in drug-running (and was
subsequently found guilty).
Mr Mbeki tried to stop him and, when he
failed, used his legal powers to suspend Mr
Pikoli and set up an inquiry, headed by
former speaker of Parliament Frene Ginwala,
into his fitness for office.
However, the Ginwala inquiry found that Mr
Pikoli was a "fit and proper" person to hold
office, but appeared to make enough findings
against him to allow the president to make
the final decision. By then, Mr Mbeki had
departed from office and it was left to then
president Kgalema Motlanthe to make the
decision. He decided, despite Dr Ginwala’s
main finding, to fire Mr Pikoli.
This meant that when the time came for the
NPA to make a decision on Mr Zuma’s charges,
it was being led in an acting capacity by
Mokotedi Mpshe.
Recent reports have shown that both he and
Mr Ngcuka ignored the opinions of the
prosecution team when making their decisions
not to prosecute Mr Zuma, and that the team
believed they had a case winnable in court.
The NPA itself is now once again being led
by an acting head, advocate Nomgcobo Jiba.
There is intense speculation as to whether
she will be permanently appointed, after
Mr Zuma used his
presidential powers to legally expunge her
husband’s criminal record.
If she is, it will feed into
perceptions that she will not be fully
independent, and that the NPA’s problems in
this area will continue.
• Grootes is an Eyewitness News Reporter
With acknowledgement to Stephen Grootes and Business Day.
Other than
Pikoli, the rest are pure stooges.
Finish 'n klaar.