GBADS a reality for the Army |
Publication |
defenceWeb |
Date | 2013-01-24 |
Reporter | Kim Helfrich |
Web link | www.defenceweb.co.za |
It’s been over 10 years in the making but the SA
Army’s air defence component can at last boast
new high-tech equipment.
The ground-based air defence system (GBADS)
first became public knowledge at the 2002 Africa
Aerospace and Defence exhibition when Armscor
announced it was entering into negotiations with
Denel for this landward defence component.
Last year saw evaluation and testing of GBADs at
AFB Swartkop followed by training of operators
at 10 Anti-Aircraft Regiment in Kimberley and a
final round of testing at the SA Army Combat
Training Centre in Northern Cape.
“The Army is now taking the new equipment into
inventory to initiate the commissioning phase.
This will take the GBADS system to operational
readiness,” Ralph Mills, chief executive of
Denel Integrated Systems Solutions (DISS) said.
This follows all contractual hardware delivery
requirements.
DISS was set up solely to support the SA
National Defence Force in acquiring GBADS, under
Project Guardian.
10 Anti-Aircraft Regiment is part of the Army’s
Air Defence Artillery Formation and will be
responsible for GBADS deployment.
Mills said he was “proud” of the DISS team for
reaching this milestone in Project Guardian.
“System integration skills have been identified
as a key strategic capability for South Africa
and in DISS we now have the basis to build on
these crucial skills. Alongside the system
engineering discipline it can contribute to many
areas in society and it is critical a start be
made on developing human capital to be ready for
the programmes of the future,” he said.
DISS is already working toward developing young
system engineers with training and mentoring by
DISS engineers underway.
With acknowledgement to Kim Helfrich and defenceWeb.
This one needs a
forensic audit.
The missiles and command and control element
were provided by Thomson-CSF (later Thales) and
ADS (later Thales).
Armscor instructed the potential competitors at
the onset, i.e. Denel, Thomson-CSF, Reutech, not
to compete, but form a consotium for a joint
bid.
This is unlawful.
Also this project is years late and vastly
over-spent.
So late is this project and so diabolical in its
"programme plan" that some hundred Thales
Starstreak missile were purchased so early in
the programme that by the time initial
set-to-work came, the missile rounds were passed
their sell by date and had to be replaced at the
cost of the taxpayer.
Why did this happen?
To give Thales business, cashflow and profit.
GBADS is one of the projects for which Zuma was
rewarded by Thomson-CSF at a rate of 500 kZAR a
year until ADS starts paying dividends for his
permanent support of Thomson-CSF projects.
King Shaka Airport is another (navigation
systems, baggage handling, IT and electronic
security, inter alia, all for a couple of
billion ZAR).
Who is man enough to undertaken such an
investigation?