SAS Amatola |
Publication |
shippingscene |
Date | 2012-09-14 |
Web Link | shippingscene.blogspot.com |
In other navy news, the frigate SAS AMATOLA
was forced to abort her planned deployment to
the Mozambique Channel where she would have been
engaged for three months of anti-pirate patrols
after one of her
main engines reportedly malfunctioned.
The frigate, which has already completed one
full deployment to the Mozambique Channel was
forced to return
to Durban and then to Port Elizabeth before
going on to Simon’s Town.
Another frigate SAA MENDI also returned from
Mozambique with engine troubles at the end of
her deployment last year. This ship has since
entered onto a planned maintenance period
including dry docking.
SAS Amatola has been
operating for about three years without one of
her two main diesel engines. Repairs were
said to be feasible during her planned main
refit when a section of her hull can be cut open
to allow the removal of the damaged engine and
its replacement.
In a reply to questions asked in parliament
earlier this year the then Minister of Defence
and Military Veterans, Lindiwe Sisulu gave the
following response:
‘None of the vessels, excluding the submarine
SAS MANTHATISI, are presently “out of service”.
They are all being managed within the approved
SA Navy Maintenance and Upkeep Programme and as
part of the short and medium term Force
Employment Plan. All issues regarding the SAS
MANTHATISI have been reported extensively and
she will in due course once again provide our
country with valuable service at sea, whilst the
next submarine will enter a refit phase.’
SAS Manthatisi remains out of service awaiting a
replacement set of batteries which will only
arrive in the country later this year. She has
been held in reserve since October 2007
following a much publicised incident involving a
fusebox. The navy has denied that the submarine,
the first to enter service with the SA Navy, was
extensively damaged by the incident when the
wrong fuse box was used for shore power to the
submarine, but ever since she has been awaiting
a battery replacement. These are said to be part
of a routine battery replacement programme aimed
at replacing batteries after eight years of
service.
“In order to ensure that the SAS Manthatisi
(S101) will be operational for a period of at
least eight years on completion of the first
minor overhaul, the SA Navy will procure a new
battery for the submarine. Each submarine will,
in turn, be fitted with a new battery on
completion of their respective minor overhauls,”
was the answer that Groenewald received last
year to another of his parliamentary questions.
According to the navy the battery consists of
480 man-sized cells and weighs 250 tonnes.
Parliament was told that a battery costs R35
million.
With acknowledgement to shippingscene.
The latest
information is that SAS Manthatisi (S101) was so
extensively damaged by the charging explosion
and subsequent corrosion, that it will be less
expensive to purchase a brand-new submarine than
replace her.
But back to patrol corvettes, one can but wonder
what Project Director RAdm(JG)[For No Good
Reason] Jonny Kamerman and his boss VAdm Robert
Simple-Anderson think about this nonsense.