Kommissie sal nie ‘vals bewerings’ ondersoek |
Publication |
Die Burger |
Date | 2013-01-24 |
Reporter | Maryna Lamprecht |
Web link | www.dieburger.com |
JOHANNESBURG. – Die Seriti-kommissie wat die
omstrede wapentransaksie van die laat 1990’s
ondersoek, gaan nie ondersoek instel na
bewerings van inmenging, ondeursigtigheid en ’n
“tweede agenda” nie.
Só het William Baloyi, die kommissie se
woordvoerder, gister gesê.
“Die kommissie se standpunt is dat die sage nou
ter ruste gelê moet word sodat ons kan fokus op
die voorbereiding vir die openbare vergaderings.”
Baloyi het gesê regter Willie Seriti, die
kommissie se voorsitter, se verduideliking oor
die bewerings is die einde van die saak.
Seriti het Dinsdag teruggekap teen bewerings wat
Norman Moabi, ’n voormalige senior ondersoeker
by die kommissie, in sy bedankingsbrief gemaak
het.
Volgens Seriti het die kommissie die volste
vertroue in sy leierskap en maak Moabi vals
bewerings om die kommissie se geloofwaardigheid
opsetlik te knou.
Volgens Seriti het Moabi ’n persoonlike grief
teen hom en is hy jaloers op die kommissie se
navorsingshoof omdat Moabi self dié pos wou
beklee.
Getuies wat oor minder as twee maande voor die
kommissie moet verskyn, het gesê hulle is meer
bekommerd as ooit ná Seriti se reaksie.
“Sy verduideliking is totale nonsens wat
absoluut niks help om my kommer te verdryf nie,”
het dr. Richard Young, een van die onsuksesvolle
tenderaars in die wapentransaksie, gesê.
Terry Crawford-Browne, ’n
wapentransaksie-aktivis, het gesê Seriti se
verduideliking help beslis nie die kommissie om
sy geloofwaardigheid te herwin nie.
“Die verklaring is absolute gemors. Seriti
beklemtoon hoe besig die kommissie was om
dokumente te ontleed en dit wys net dat die
kommissie van sy pligte afwyk.’
David Maynier, DA-LP en ook ’n getuie, het gesê
Seriti het ’n gulde geleentheid om die kommissie
se naam in ere te herstel deur sy vingers laat
glip.
With acknowledgement to Maryna Lamprecht en Die Burger.
assisted Google Online translation
JOHANNESBURG. The Seriti commission the
controversial arms deal of the late 1990s
inquiry will not investigate allegations of
interference, opacity and a "second agenda".
Thus said William Baloyi, the commission's
spokesman, yesterday.
"The commission's view is that the saga should
now be laid to rest so we can focus on preparing
for public meetings."
Baloyi said Judge Willie Seriti the commission's
chairman, explanation over allegations should
the end of the matter.
Seriti on Tuesday retaliated against allegations
that Norman Moabi, a former senior investigator
at the commission, made in his resignation
letter.
Seriti said the commission was confident in his
leadership and Moabi's false allegations were an
intentional blow to the commission's
credibility.
According to Seriti, Moabi had personal
grievance against him and he is jealous of the
commission's head of research because Moabi
himself would wanted that position.
Witnesses who have less than two months to
appear before the commission, said they are more
worried than ever after Seriti's response.
"His explanation is total nonsense that
absolutely does not help to dispel my concerns,"
said Dr Richard Young, one of the unsuccessful
bidders in the arms deal.
Terry Crawford-Browne, an arms deal activist,
said Seriti the commission's explanation
certainly does not help regain its credibility.
"The statement is absolute rubbish. Seriti
emphasised how busy the commission was in
analysing documents and it just shows that the
commission is not doing its duties.
David Maynier, DA MP and also a witness, said
Seriti let a golden opportunity to restore the
commission's name in honor slip through his
fingers.
With acknowledgement to Maryna Lamprecht en Die Burger.
It's as clear as
dammit.
If the commission actually investigated Moabi's
allegations, it might find that they had
substance.
And a first-year law student could do a better
job of crafting a rebuttal.