Publication: ANC
Issued:
Date: 2008-08-29
Reporter: ANC
Memorandum to the Directorate of Specialised Operations (DSO or
Scorpions) |
African National Congress, Durban Region
29 August 2008
http://www.friendsofjz.co.za/documents.asp?orderBy=DESC&SortBy=DateCreated
Realising that it is in the interest of our country that all citizens be treated
equally before the law;
Realising further that it is undesirable that the State organs should be used to
advance the political battles of any individual(s);
And realising further that the arms deal investigations have not been subjected
to a thorough judicial inquiry and that unless it has so been subjected it shall
always be unjust to target certain individuals and smear them with selective
incriminating aspects of the arms deal;
And
Noting that the President of the African National Congress, Comrade Jacob Zuma
has not been treated equally before the law in the arms deal saga;
And noting further that Comrade Jacob Zuma was tried and convicted in his
absence in the case of the State v Shabir Shaik;
And noting further that Comrade Jacob Zuma has been tried and convicted in the
public opinion by the media even before the formal charges could be put to him.
In this respect having no doubt that such prosecution by the media of Comrade
Jacob Zuma arose out of the "off the record" briefing of journalists by Bulelani
Ngcuka where he galvanised the meadia to help him persecute Comrade Jacob Zuma;
And noting further that the then Minister of Justice Mr Penuel Maduna and
Bulelani Ngcuka convicted Comrade Jacob Zuma in the public opinion by declaring
that there is "a prima facie but not winnable case" against Comrade Jacob Zuma;
WE THEREFORE BELIEVE AND DECLARE THAT:
A. COMRADE JACOB ZUMA SHALL NOT RECEIVE A FAIR TRIAL.
WE DEMAND THEREFORE THAT
B. THE CHARGES CURRENTLY PENDING AGAINST COMRADE JACOB ZUMA
BE WITHDRAWN AND BE DROPPED PERMANENTLY.
THE REASONS WHY WE SAY SO ARE AS FOLLOWS:
THE SCORPIONS ARE BEING USED AS POLITICAL TOOLS TO PROSECUTE COMRADE JACOB ZUMA
BECAUSE :
1. The Scorpions have investigated Comrade Jacob Zuma for
more than 7 (Seven) years without formulating charges against him;
2. The Scorpions have leaked information forming part of the
investigation to the public with the sole aim of destroying the public image of
Cde Jacob Zuma and tarnish his political standing;
3. The Scorpions falsely told Judge Msimang in July 2006
that they would be ready by February 2008 to charge Cde Jacob Zuma and they
failed to do so;
4. Mokotedi Mpshe, the Acting Director of Public
Prosecutions, announced in the media that they could only charge Cde Jacob Zuma
on or about April 2008 after they had charged Commissioner Selebi, yet as soon
as Cde Jacob Zuma won the elections in Polokwane he was charged within a period
of two weeks of his win and long before Selebi could be charged;
5. The Scorpions made sure are that Cde Jacob Zuma was
served with the charges when he was entertaining multitudes of poor people
during the festive seasons. The Scorpions made sure that the charges were served
in a manner that was intended to humiliate Comrade Zuma and dampen the spirit of
the occasion;
6. The Scorpions are now peddling propaganda that Cde Zuma
is delaying that trial when he is pursuing his constitutional remedies and
pretend that they have been ever ready to proceed yet there is a court judgement
of September 2006 where Judge Msimang struck the case off the roll because the
Scorpions were not ready;
7. Most importantly the Scorpions are now insisting that the
date of trial coincides with the elections, clearly in pursuit of a political
agenda to try and exclude Cde Zuma from playing a meaningful role in the
elections and further to ensure his Presidency of the country is prevented;
8. The Scorpions have gone to the extent of manufacturing
that Cde Zuma is being assisted by foreign countries to overthrow Cde Thabo
Mbeki as president of the country. The discredited Browse Mole report is
testimony to the political farce the Scorpions are engaged in;
9. The Scorpions are on record as having conspired to ensure
that Cde Zuma did not win in Polokwane so that their self interest of being not
dissolved could be extended.
NO COURT WILL GIVE COMRADE JACOB ZUMA A FAIR TRIAL
1. The Scorpions will mislead the Courts and will not
present the case in a balanced way so that the courts will be misled to arrive
at an unfair result because the Scorpions are being politically manipulated.
They have a history of doing so as they did it before Judge Msimang. In that
case they said that there had been an agreement with the defence on a certain
aspect of the postponement but when the defence denied this they somersaulted
and they said they assumed the defence had agreed. This was clearly typical of
the Scorpions rotten agenda which they will repeat if they are allowed to
continue with the case;
2. The case of Cde Zuma has been commented upon so
extensively, wrongly and in a skewed fashion that in our view no Court will try
Cde Jacob Zuma without any preconceived ideas;
3. The second highest court, namely the Supreme Court of
Appeal is a clear example of the dangers inherent in the continued trial of Cde
Zuma when it erred and said the trial judge had said there was a "generally
corrupt relationship" between Cde Zuma and Cde Shabir Shaik whereas the trial
judge had never said such. It is clear that the judges were influenced by the
falsity of the media statements rather than the documents and arguments before
them;
4. A Durban judge said that Cde Zuma had said he wanted his
day in Court whereas none of the documents that were before him contained that
allegation. Clearly he must have picked that up in corridor gossip or in the
media and transposed it into the court of law, a clear case of the real danger
of a potential legal pollution of the judges' minds in the future trial;
5. In the recent Constitutional Court judgement the court
said that there was a real risk that if the attorney for Cde Zuma were to
inform Cde Zuma that the Scorpions wanted certain documents, Cde Zuma would
uplift and destroy those documents. This is a clear prejudgment of the
character of Cde Zuma as being dishonest even before he goes on trial, let alone
appealing to that constitutional Court. It is unthinkable that in the light of
this unwarranted statement by the Constitutional Court, Cde Zuma will be viewed
as an honest citizen of the country, instead he will be presumed dishonest
unless he proves otherwise, a gross distortion of our constitutional tenets.
3 . THE DEMAND TO REVISIT THE CASE
OF PHILLIP POWELL
The Scorpions arbitrarily and with great mischief decided
to absolve Phillip Powell who had stock piled lethal weapons.
We believe that our people who are being moved down
especially in hostels are victims of the beneficiaries of weapons that were
hidden by Powell.
We demand that the Scorpions bring back Powell to point
out more weapons as we believe that not enough investigation was conducted
against him.
Submitted by the African National Congress, Durban Region
on the 29th August 2008.
1.
SIGNED:________________________________
For and on behalf of ANC Durban Region
2. Received and signed for by
Signature :_____________________________
Name :________________________________
On behalf of the Scorpions
With
acknowledgements to the ANC.
"The Scorpions being used as political tools to
prosecute Comrade Jacob Zuma"
1. Lies.
2. Probably untrue, but where is the proof.
3. Lies.
4. So what?
5. So what?
6. It is true that Cde Zuma is delaying his trial. The
Constitutional Court has very recently pronounced that this is undesirable.
7. The Scorpions have nothing to do with setting a trial
date. The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) would like the trial to start as
early in January 2009 as possible (three months before the election in April
2009), but will on valid grounds be prepared to delay this until July 2009 if
Zuma and The Two Thint insist on this.
8. Whatever and whoever is behind the Browse Mole Report has
got nothing to do with the bribery, corruption, racketeering, money laundering
and fraud charges against Jacob Zuma as formulated by the NPA.
9. Even this was true, there is nothing wrong with an organ
of state, born by virtue of statute, wanting to ensure its existance in the face
of polictical presuure.
This is not conspiracy, just bone fide survival.
"No court will give Comrade Jacob Zuma a fair trial"
1. The Scorpions do not prosecute the case. This is done
by the NPA.
Is the Durban Branch of the ANC alleging that the NPA is also rotten?
2. It is the say-so of the Durban Branch of the ANC that the
case of Cde Zuma has been commented upon wrongly and in a skewed fashion.
The views of others are entirely different.
It is highly unlikely that the High Court under Judge Chris Nicholson will try
Cde Jacob Zuma with any preconceived ideas.
If he does, Cde Zuma can take the matter on appeal before 5 judges of the
Supreme Court of Appeal. This would be likely to happen in the 2011 to 2012
timeframe by which time there would be a fresh crop of appeal judges from those
who heard the Schabir Shaik appeal.
3. This was a minor error for which the SCA apologised and
it corrected.
The trial judge in effect found that there was a generally corrupt relationship
between Schabir Shaik and Jacob Zuma, only he used slightly different words.
After reviewing the evidence and legal arguments, the SCA found that there was
indeed a generally corrupt relationship between Schabir Shaik and Jacob Zuma and
used those exact words words.
4. The only proper forum to test, reply to and defend
against criminal charges is in a court of law.
- "For a period of five years my person has been subjected to all types of
allegations and innuendo, paraded through the media and other corridors of
influence without these allegations having being tested. I have thereby been
denied my constitutional right to reply and defend myself."
- Jacob Gedleyihlekisa Zuma, June 29, 2005.
Jacob Gedleyihlekisa Zuma has to all intents and purposes asked to test, reply
to and defend the criminal charges against him.
That is the same as asking for his day in court.
And it matters not that such a request be made in legal papers or in any other
on-the-record manner.
5. It is entirely appropriate for the Constitutional Court
to judge such a matter because that is what it was requested to do. And Cde
Jacob Zuma was the applicant in that matter and so it was he who triggered the
CCs judgment.
Cde Jacob Zuma has also already and validly been found guilty of dishonesty,
albeit in the court of public opinion, because he lied to the public via his
written response to a Member of Parliament's written question about whether or
not he met with Alain Thetard of Thomson-CSF.
Too late she cried, he is a least guilty of that.